orders of detention were vitiated on the
ground that relied upon documents were not served
along with the orders of detention and grounds of
detention ... Customs Act. The orders of
detention were issued on 17.05.2019. The detention orders
along with grounds of detention were served on the detenues
detention orders by resorting to
preventive detention law, on which count the impugned order of detention
stands vitiated. The Petitioner prayed that the impugned detention ... interval between the
passing of the detention order and the execution of the order has diluted
the detention order and defeated the very purpose
order of detention under the COFEPOSA Act against the appellant, and
subsequently respondent No.2 detaining authority passed the impugned
detention order as against ... present detention is
concerned, is identical to the case of the co-detenue who’s detention order
was quashed.
42. At the sake of repetition
order of detention as apprehended by the Detaining
Authority. It is submitted that as on date if the detention order is
quashed, the detenus will ... First is the handwritten order and other is a typed order. All
other orders are typed orders. The handwritten order does not
bear the stamp
invalidate order of
detention--Detention order can be made in anticipation to
operate on release of detenue.
HEADNOTE:
By an order dated 7.9.88 the Collector ... order under s. 12(1) of the Act confirmed
the order of detention agreeing with the opinion of the
Advisory Board and ordered the detention
detaining
authority--Detention order quashed.
HEADNOTE:
The petitioner-detenue was detained pursuant to an order
of detention passed under s. 3(2) of the National ... detention order was passed, he
had moved applications for bail and was released on three
successive days in the three cases. The detention order
Punjab & Haryana for
quashing the detention
421
order contending inter-alia that the order of detention was
passed on 28.5.88 in a cursory ... Punjab and Haryana for
quashing the detention order contending, inter alia, that
the order of detention was passed on 28.5.1988 in a cursory
and routine
period
of
detention there must be fresh facts of passing a subseque
nt
order. A fortiori when a detention order is quashed ... earlier detention order alongwith other materials f
or
passing this impugned order. Hence, the order is liable
to
be set aside. Accordingly, we quash
order of detention passed by an
officer specially empowered to make a detention order. In
all the above said Acts, an order of detention passed ... Preventive
Detention Act by District Magistrate empowered under the Act
to pass the detention orders. In both the cases the
detention orders were quashed
order of detention. In that case, the detention order was
passed on 25.02.1999 but the authorities have chosen to execute the
detention order only ... proposal for detention and order of
detention was not explained properly, hence, this Court quashed the
detention order.
20) It is clear that
