orders of detention were vitiated on the
ground that relied upon documents were not served
along with the orders of detention and grounds of
detention ... Customs Act. The orders of
detention were issued on 17.05.2019. The detention orders
along with grounds of detention were served on the detenues
order of detention as apprehended by the Detaining
Authority. It is submitted that as on date if the detention order is
quashed, the detenus will ... First is the handwritten order and other is a typed order. All
other orders are typed orders. The handwritten order does not
bear the stamp
quashed third detention order dated
31.03.2018 as well. Notwithstanding quashment of successive three
detention orders, respondents have issued one more detention order,
impugned in present ... impugned order
of detention herein, are identical to grounds of detention which were
made use of while issuing earlier detention orders, quashed by this
Court
detention and that cogent and relevant material disclosed the necessity for making an order of detention. In that case the detention order was quashed ... grounds of detention cannot sustain the detention order and has to be ignored.
11. In our opinion, the detention order in question only contains ipse
detention and that cogent and relevant material disclosed the necessity for making an order of detention. In that case the detention order was quashed ... grounds of detention cannot sustain the detention order and has to be ignored.
11. In our opinion, the detention order in question only contains ipse
detenu under preventive detention, are identical to the grounds of detention in
support of earlier detention orders which either were quashed or revoked. The
respondents ... detenu all along remained in detention. Once we find the grounds of detention in
support of quashed/revoked detention order(s) and one under challenge
custody when previous detention order
was passed.
11. In new detention order impugned in this petition, the grounds of detention
are same except some additional ... period of detention
there must be fresh facts of passing a subsequent order. A
fortiori when a detention order is quashed by the Court issuing
adverted to in the detention order were included
in the earlier detention order dated 14-6-2016 which was quashed.
Further of those 16 criminal ... material in subsequent detention order, which
were considered in the earlier detention order, nullifies the entire
subsequent order of detention.
We are thus
earlier order of detention could not be
made base for the impugned order of detention. Once a detention order is
quashed, whatever grounds formed base ... detention order is struck down by the Court as it sets at naught not only
detention order but the grounds on which the detention order
impugned
order of detention herein, are identical to grounds of detention, which were
made use of while issuing earlier detention orders, quashed by this Court ... period of detention, there must be fresh facts
for passing a subsequent detention order. When a detention order is
quashed by the Court, issuing
