paper also, keeping in view inter alia the
letter of the Dev. Engineer (Exports) NRDC dated
31.10.1989 and the application dated 7.9.90 of the
Claimant
judgment rendered by the Apex Court in the case of Asst. Engineer,
Rajasthan Dev. Corporation and Anr. vs. Gitam Singh
places reliance on the decisions of the Supreme Court in
Asst. Engineer, Rajasthan Dev, Corporation and Ors. Vs. Gitam Singh
(2013) 5SCC 136 and this
Assistant
Engineer, Rajasthan State Agriculture Marketing Board, Sub Division,
Kota Vs. Mohan Lal 2013 IV LLJ 105 (SC) & Asst. Engineer Rajasthan
Dev. Corporation
report dated 24.11.1999, filed in the civil suit, the Assistant Engineer had simply observed that the case was considered on merits and decided that ... have been perused. Order dated 16.4.1999 has been read. The Zonal Engineer, Mr. Dev Prakash, has passed a detailed order, referring to the old house
considered sufficient to meet the ends of justice.
15. In Assistant Engineer, Rajasthan Dev. Corporation and Anr. Vs. Gitam
Singh
Similar is the
view taken by the Supreme Court in Assistant Engineer, Rajasthan Dev.
Corporation and Anr. Vs. Gitam Singh
date of termination or passing of the award.
In Asst. Engineer, Rajasthan Dev. Corporation and Anr. v. Gitam
Singh Civil Appeal No. 8415/2009, decided
Asst.
W.P. (C) No. 5513/2004 Page 6 of 9
Engineer, Rajasthan Dev. Corporation and Anr. vs. Gitam Singh
1929/2000 Page 5 of 8
7. In Assistant Engineer, Rajasthan Dev. Corporation and Anr. Vs.
Gitam Singh , (2013) II LLJ 141 SC, Supreme Court
