conducted evaluation properly.
3. There are traces of evaluation in the answer scripts.
4. There is no violation of any procedure in digital evaluation ... evaluators while
evaluating the answer scripts. According to them, the answer scripts
carry no marks and tick (√) marks of whatsoever. Therefore, the
evaluation conducted
conducted evaluation properly.
3. There are traces of evaluation in the answer scripts.
4. There is no violation of any procedure in digital evaluation ... evaluators while
evaluating the answer scripts. According to them, the answer scripts
carry no marks and tick (√) marks of whatsoever. Therefore, the
evaluation conducted
conducted evaluation properly.
3. There are traces of evaluation in the answer scripts.
4. There is no violation of any procedure in digital evaluation ... evaluators while
evaluating the answer scripts. According to them, the answer scripts
carry no marks and tick (√) marks of whatsoever. Therefore, the
evaluation conducted
conducted evaluation properly.
3. There are traces of evaluation in the answer scripts.
4. There is no violation of any procedure in digital evaluation ... evaluators while
evaluating the answer scripts. According to them, the answer scripts
carry no marks and tick (√) marks of whatsoever. Therefore, the
evaluation conducted
affidavit filed by the Respondents is extracted below:
Procedure of Digital Procedure of Digital
Evaluation followed in Post Evaluation followed in Ist year
Graduate Medical ... process
evaluation is conducted in the of digital valuation is as follows:
following steps: a) Digital evaluation portal link and
login credentials are sent
write all the papers. The evaluation process is a mockery.
Hitherto, manual evaluation was adopted and digitalized evaluation
was started in 2016. The answer scripts ... their answer sheets, the digital sheets were not shown
to them, but only manual scripts were shown. If the
digital evaluation method is transparent, each
digital answer scripts
by using digital tools like stylus etc., and awarding
marks on each answer script. The respondents are
further directed to evaluate answer ... earlier the examiners who are
evaluating the answer scripts were not affixing their
signatures while evaluating the answer scripts digitally and
without any signatures
said paper was evaluated by 3rd evaluator. The said
answer scripts was referred to 3rd evaluator for the
purpose of evaluation by respondent ... marks awarded by 1st and 2nd evaluator is 14.
Therefore, the same was evaluated by 3rd evaluator
vast difference in the evaluation. A reference is
made to the following marks:
B. HUMAN ANATOMY PAPER-II
Evaluation-1 Evaluation ... marks awarded by 1st and 2nd evaluator is 14. Therefore, the
same was evaluated by 3rd evaluator, who awarded 23.5
marks out of 100 marks
answer scripts
are issued to the valuators in a digital form and sample of the digital
valuation system is as under:
Event Logged Example
Examiner ... necessity of re-evaluation. Further, in said case, it
was held that the University had adopted digital valuation, which was
subsequently modified, improved, and deficiencies
