Commission, due to Covid Pandemic effect, gave consent for
Digital Evaluation of answer scripts (total 07 papers) and Camps
were conducted from January ... evaluation preparatory work
arrangements took place and answer scripts were shifted to
Haailand Resorts for further evaluation process.
(e) That an evaluation camp was scheduled
Commission, due to Covid Pandemic effect, gave consent for
Digital Evaluation of answer scripts (total 07 papers) and Camps
were conducted from January ... evaluation preparatory work
arrangements took place and answer scripts were shifted to
Haailand Resorts for further evaluation process.
(e) That an evaluation camp was scheduled
said paper was evaluated by 3rd evaluator. The said
answer scripts was referred to 3rd evaluator for the
purpose of evaluation by respondent ... marks awarded by 1st and 2nd evaluator is 14.
Therefore, the same was evaluated by 3rd evaluator
Upon
conclusion of the main Examination the APPSC proposed for digital evaluation
of answer scripts, based on the same, results were announced. Unsuccessful
candidates challenging ... Writ Petition was allowed, setting
aside the digital evaluation directing for conducting of manual evaluation.
6. In furtherance of the same, the petitioner
Upon
conclusion of the main Examination the APPSC proposed for digital evaluation
of answer scripts, based on the same, results were announced. Unsuccessful
candidates challenging ... Writ Petition was allowed, setting
aside the digital evaluation directing for conducting of manual evaluation.
6. In furtherance of the same, the petitioner
digital valuation system.
Re-evaluation- Means evaluation conducted by the
first eligible examiner of the respective faculties
through the digital valuation system.
4. PROCEDURE ... evaluation by the first eligible examiner and re-
evaluation by the second eligible examiner of the
respective faculties through the digital valuation
system before
vast difference in the evaluation. A reference is
made to the following marks:
B. HUMAN ANATOMY PAPER-II
Evaluation-1 Evaluation ... marks awarded by 1st and 2nd evaluator is 14. Therefore, the
same was evaluated by 3rd evaluator, who awarded 23.5
marks out of 100 marks
Dixit J., had made thought provoking
observations in the matter of digital evaluation of
answer papers and the need for model key
answers. The petitioners ... objective benchmark, there being no
efficacy or transparency in the digital evaluation
process. If a model answer key had been
provided to all the valuators
digital valuation system.
Re-evaluation- Means evaluation conducted by the
first eligible examiner of the respective faculties
through the digital valuation system.
4. PROCEDURE ... general
evaluation by the first eligible examiner and re-
evaluation by the second eligible examiner of the
respective faculties through the digital valuation
system before
digital valuation system.
Re-evaluation- Means evaluation conducted by the
first eligible examiner of the respective faculties
through the digital valuation system.
4. PROCEDURE ... general
evaluation by the first eligible examiner and re-
evaluation by the second eligible examiner of the
respective faculties through the digital valuation
system before
