Dixit J., had made thought provoking
observations in the matter of digital evaluation of
answer papers and the need for model key
answers. The petitioners ... objective benchmark, there being no
efficacy or transparency in the digital evaluation
process. If a model answer key had been
provided to all the valuators
account of the above that the
evaluators had evaluated the papers and
there are marked discrepancies and
variation in the marks allotted by them ... scripts to be
evaluated by the 5th evaluator.
3.7. A Notification dated 03.12.2019 was issued
by the respondent - University regarding
Digital Valuations Centres and Tagged
main examination papers
is conducted by the KPSC by digital evaluation.
All the papers are evaluated by two examiners
and if the difference between ... dates on which the exams were held, etc.,
6.2. The 'Digital Evaluation and on Screen Marking'
methodology used by the petitioner is supplied
evaluator has not evaluated the
same and had mentioned NA (Not Answered) against question
No.4 in the Digital Evaluation Slip and the 2nd evaluator ... evaluator has not evaluated the same and had mentioned as
NA (Not Answered) against question No.4 in the Digital
Evaluation Slip
Basanth K B vs Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health ... on 11 February, 2021
Equivalent citations
Theory Answer Scripts:
a. All the theory answer scripts are evaluated through
Digital valuation System of RGUHS.
b. i) General Valuation: All the theory answer ... revamp the process to a great extent by
introduction of digital evaluation system. The initial teething
problems in conducting exams and evaluating the papers
RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES
REPRESENTED BY ITS
REGISTRAR (EVALUATION)
Digitally signed 4TH BLOCK JAYANAGARA
by CHANDANA BENGALURU - 560 041.
BM ...RESPONDENT
Location: High ... declared as failed.
3. Immediately thereafter petitioner applied for digital
evaluation and he was shocked on perusal of marks allotted
to him by the individual
digital valuation system.
Re-evaluation- Means evaluation conducted by the
first eligible examiner of the respective faculties
through the digital valuation system.
4. PROCEDURE ... evaluation by the first eligible examiner and re-
evaluation by the second eligible examiner of the
respective faculties through the digital valuation
system before
regarding mode of examination and appointment
of Examiners. It was submitted that evaluation of preliminary
examination was to be conducted by a team ... that all answer scripts of Post Graduate Courses were to be
digitally evaluated and average total marks awarded by four
evaluators was to be considered
regarding mode of examination and appointment
of Examiners. It was submitted that evaluation of preliminary
examination was to be conducted by a team ... that all answer scripts of Post Graduate Courses were to be
digitally evaluated and average total marks awarded by four
evaluators was to be considered
