M/S Patil Automation Private Limited vs Rakheja Engineers Private Limited on 17 August, 2022
careful, prompt amendment. of Sec.
2(j) would have preempted this docket explosion before
tribunals and courts. This Court, perhaps more than the
legislative
R. S. Joshi, S.T.O. Gujarat Etc. Etc vs Ajit Mills Ltd., Ahmedabad &
prompt
amendment of Section 2(j) would have pre-empted this docket explosion
before tribunals and Courts. This Court, perhaps more than the legislative
concluding cases/suits in India because of the
exponentially increasing docket explosion, temporary ad interim injunctions
are of far reaching consequences, oftentimes effectively deciding
East India Hotels Ltd. vs Syndicate Bank on 12 September, 1991
Equivalent citations: I(1992
different tiers of judicial scrutiny is one of the reasons for
docket explosion. The Income Tax Department of the Government of India ... before the Supreme Court.
3. Mindful of the phenomenon of the docket explosion and the rising litigation in the
country, the Union of India
tricks. No doubt long
delay in disposal of cases due to docket
explosion became a ruse to unscrupulous
litigant to abuse the due course
involved and the long
delay in disposal of cases due to docket explosion in Courts, would not have
made it possible for the depositors
counsel when
the volume of litigation demanded it, would have clogged the
dockets in Court and helped one pleader to corner all the
briefs without ... need and with a view to help the
court liquidate the docket explosion, appointed more than
one government pleader for every District, depending