Class
Magistrate at Bhongir;
ii) to quash the Complaint dated 01.07.2022 in DVC
No.16 of 2022 under Sections ... Violence
Case against the petitioners and her husband, which was
registered as DVC No.16 of 2022 under Sections
Sessions Judge, Cyberabad, NTR Nagar, Hyderabad
wherein the order dated 20.01.2011 in DVC No. 17 of 2008, on the file
of the learned X Metropolitan ... quash the proceedings in Criminal MP No.904 of 2018 in DVC No.17 of
2008, on the file of the learned X Metropolitan Magistrate
Sessions Judge, Cyberabad, NTR Nagar, Hyderabad
wherein the order dated 20.01.2011 in DVC No. 17 of 2008, on the file
of the learned X Metropolitan ... quash the proceedings in Criminal MP No.904 of 2018 in DVC No.17 of
2008, on the file of the learned X Metropolitan Magistrate
dated 01.10.2018 passed in
Crl.M.P.No.586 of 2018 in DVC No.17 of 2011 pending on the
file of the Judicial Magistrate ... passed in Crl.M.P.No.584
of 2018 in the said DVC.
2. Heard Sri P.Vamsheedhar Reddy, learned counsel for
the petitioner, learned
dated 01.10.2018 passed in
Crl.M.P.No.586 of 2018 in DVC No.17 of 2011 pending on the
file of the Judicial Magistrate ... passed in Crl.M.P.No.584
of 2018 in the said DVC.
2. Heard Sri P.Vamsheedhar Reddy, learned counsel for
the petitioner, learned
order
dated 23.01.2024 passed in M.P.No.361 of 2023 in DVC.No.01
of 2023 by the Judge, Principal Family Court, Secunderabad ... Order VII Rule 11 read with Section 151
CPC seeking transfer of DVC No.01 of 2023 from the Family
Court, Secunderabad, to the Metropolitan
Petitioners herein are respondents in the said
DVC.
2. Heard Sri T. Bala Mohan Reddy, learned counsel for the
petitioners and Sri Suresh Bhaktula, learned ... Section 468
of Cr.PC is no way applicable to the DVC proceedings. The said
application is within the period of limitation. With the said
neglected the respondent
Nos.1 and 2-plaintiffs thereby she filed DVC before the XI M.M.
Court, Cyberabad, at L.B. Nagar ... certified copy of order dated 11.06.2010 in
DVC No.13 of 2009 passed by the learned XI Metropolitan
Magistrate, Cyberabad, at L.B. Nagar
that later the
petitioner started harassing the respondent for which she filed DVC
No.140 of 2013 on the file of the Court ... that the petitioner failed
to pay the maintenance awarded in DVC No.140 of 2013 though he
owned several properties and that
that later the
petitioner started harassing the respondent for which she filed DVC
No.140 of 2013 on the file of the Court ... that the petitioner failed
to pay the maintenance awarded in DVC No.140 of 2013 though he
owned several properties and that
