that complainant had
challenged the allotment in an open area and in case the parking is
allotted in an open area then ... judgment cannot squarely be
applied to the Punjab Apartment and Property Regulation Act, 1995
(in short 'PAPRA') and the rules framed thereunder
rules and regulations of A.P. Apartments (Promotion and Construction of Owners)
Act,1 987. The complainant also wrote
letter dated 19.6.2008 to GHMC authorities ... complainant also filed suit O.S.No.1590 of 2008 for his easement
right which is still pending. Therefore,
the complainant filed the complaint before
Indore in Case No.1438/2010 whereby the
complaint filed by respondent / Yusuf Aagarwal has
been allowed.
- 3 -
3.
In
short, the case ... said common service land to
the ground floor apartment allottees. This act of Housing Board was against the
provisions of the M. P. Prakoshtha Swamitva
instant complaint under section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for brevity, 'the Act') is at the behest of an intending purchaser ... services in a dispute of housing construction.
Succinctly put, complainants' case is that on 30.05.2014 they had entered into an agreement with the Opposite
common facilities and easement rights.
After entered appearance, the Opposite Parties by filing written version contesting the case and during pendency of the same ... look to the provision of Section 17(1)(b) of the Act which provides -
"to call for the records and pass appropriate orders
instant complaint under section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for brevity, 'the Act') is at the behest of a couple/intending ... services in a dispute of housing construction.
Succinctly put, complainants' case is that on 30.05.2014 they had entered into an agreement with the Opposite
instant complaint under section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for brevity, 'the Act') is at the instance of intending purchasers against ... services in a dispute of housing construction.
Succinctly put, complainants' case is that on 25.04.2014 they had entered into an agreement with the Opposite
instant complaint under section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for brevity, 'the Act') is at the behest of an intending purchaser ... services in a dispute of housing construction.
Succinctly put, complainants' case is that on 25.04.2014 they had entered into an agreement with the Opposite
instant complaint under section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for brevity, 'the Act') is at the instance of an intending purchaser ... services in a dispute of housing construction.
Succinctly put, complainants' case is that on 15.01.2014 she entered into an agreement with the Opposite Party
Act, 19867 against the OPs alleging deficiency in service.
The facts of the case, in brief, are that one Bhabesh Chandra Bhattacharyya (now deceased ... parcel of land measuring more or less 5 cottahas together with all easement rights appertaining thereto, situated at Mouja - Sodepur
