comply with section 65B(4)
of the Evidence Act to admit any electronic evidence. Furthermore,
the counsel suggested the case of Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v.
Kailash ... admit electronic records. He further pointed out the
procedural formalities that must be followed by the investigating
officer while conducting the Test identification parade
comply with section 65B(4)
of the Evidence Act to admit any electronic evidence. Furthermore,
the counsel suggested the case of Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v.
Kailash ... admit electronic records. He further pointed out the
procedural formalities that must be followed by the investigating
officer while conducting the Test identification parade
comply with section 65B(4)
of the Evidence Act to admit any electronic evidence. Furthermore,
the counsel suggested the case of Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v.
Kailash ... admit electronic records. He further pointed out the
procedural formalities that must be followed by the investigating
officer while conducting the Test identification parade
comply with section 65B(4)
of the Evidence Act to admit any electronic evidence. Furthermore,
the counsel suggested the case of Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v.
Kailash ... admit electronic records. He further pointed out the
procedural formalities that must be followed by the investigating
officer while conducting the Test identification parade
comply with section 65B(4)
of the Evidence Act to admit any electronic evidence. Furthermore,
the counsel suggested the case of Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v.
Kailash ... admit electronic records. He further pointed out the
procedural formalities that must be followed by the investigating
officer while conducting the Test identification parade
comply with section 65B(4)
of the Evidence Act to admit any electronic evidence. Furthermore,
the counsel suggested the case of Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v.
Kailash ... admit electronic records. He further pointed out the
procedural formalities that must be followed by the investigating
officer while conducting the Test identification parade
comply with section 65B(4)
of the Evidence Act to admit any electronic evidence. Furthermore,
the counsel suggested the case of Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v.
Kailash ... admit electronic records. He further pointed out the
procedural formalities that must be followed by the investigating
officer while conducting the Test identification parade
comply with section 65B(4)
of the Evidence Act to admit any electronic evidence. Furthermore,
the counsel suggested the case of Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v.
Kailash ... admit electronic records. He further pointed out the
procedural formalities that must be followed by the investigating
officer while conducting the Test identification parade
Guddu Kumar Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 7 November, 2019
Author: Sudhir Singh
Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 14 December
