Pulukuri Kottaya vs King-Emperor on 19 December, 1946
JUDGMENT
John Beaumont, J.
1. This is an appeal by special leave against the judgment ... proviso to Section 162 as matter of gravity. Baliram Tikaram v. Emperor [1945] A.I.R. Nag. 1 where the record of statements made
altered to one under that
section.
N. A. Subramania Iyer v. King-Emperor ([1901] L.R. 28 I.
A. 257), explained.
Babulal Choukhani ... King-Emperor ([1938] L.R. 65 I. A.
158), Pulukuri Kotayya v. King-Emperor ([1947] L.R. 74 I.A.
65), Abdul Rahman v. King
proceed
further with the trial. [333C]
Manzur Hussain v. Emperor, AIR 1928 All. 55(1); Sadh
Ram v. State, AIR 1953 HP 121; Emperor ... Harpal Raj, ILR
XXIV All. 454; A. Malcom v. Emperor, AIR 1933 Cal. 218;
Emperor v. Koya Hansji, 14 Bom. L.R. 964; Parmeshwar Singh
Nazir Ahmad vs Emperor (No. 2) on 16 June, 1936
Equivalent citations: (1936)38BOMLR987
JUDGMENT
Roche, J.
1. This is an appeal in forma pauperis ... advise His Majesty to interfere (see Vaithinatha Pillai v. The King-Emperor
Emperor vs Khwaja Nazir Ahmed on 17 October, 1944
Equivalent citations: (1945)47BOMLR245
JUDGMENT
Porter, J.
1. This appeal is brought from a judgment
Sheo Swarup vs King-Emperor on 26 July, 1934
Equivalent citations: (1934)36BOMLR1185
JUDGMENT
Russell, J.
1. This appeal was brought by special leave from
Nasir Ahmad And Ors. vs King-Emperor on 12 May, 1927
Equivalent citations: AIR1927ALL579, AIR 1927 ALLAHABAD 579
JUDGMENT
Dalal, J.
1. Abdul Rauf ... forward by the learned Counsel, is that of Chander Sekhar v. Emperor [1920] 21 Cr. L.J. 59. As it is not reported
State, A.I.R. 1957 All. 239; Mohinder Singh v.
Emperor, A.I.R. 1932 Lah. 103; Yusuf Mia v. Emperor ... judgment of Hosain, J., in the case of
Rustam v. King-Emperor (1) and the decisions in Fanindra
Nath Banerjee v. Emperor ( 2), King-Emperor
Pakala Narayana Swami vs Emperor on 19 January, 1939
Equivalent citations: (1939)41BOMLR428
JUDGMENT
Atkin, J.
1. This is an appeal by special leave from ... representative opinions on either side may be taken to be Azimuddy v. Emperor (1926) I.L.R. 54 Cal. 237 in a judgment
Santokhi Beldar v. King Emperor, (1933)
I.L.R. 12 Pat. 241, referred to.
West Coast Hotel Company v. Parrish ... with his guilt
and inconsistent with his innocence.
Pakala Narayan Swami v. Emperor, (1939) L. R. 66 I.A. 66,
applied.
Per Subba
