Section 498 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Code, 1860
498. Enticing or taking away or detaining with criminal intent a married woman.—
Whoever takes or entices away any woman
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12890 (1.03 seconds)Nemai Chattoraj vs Queen-Empress on 9 June, 1900
conceded, the accused had nothing to do with the actual taking or enticing out of the keeping of the lawful guardian, and did not appear ... completed when the accused joined in taking the girl to Calcutta, and that the taking and enticing out of the keeping of the guardian
Shajahan vs State Of Kerala on 29 July, 2010
consent which takes the case out of its
purview. Nor is it necessary that the taking or
enticing must be shown to have been ... taking"
can never take place would be too unrealistic and impermissible.
The distinction between "take" and "entice" cannot certainly
Khanjan Narjibhai Palas vs State Of Gujarat on 18 September, 2025
lawful guardian"
finds explanation in the Section. The act of taking or
enticing any female under the age of 18 years ... consent which takes the case out of
its purview. Nor is it necessary that the taking or enticing
must be shown to have been
State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Pawan Kumar And Another on 20 August, 2024
paragraph of s. 361
.
of the Indian Penal Code :
"Whoever takes or entices any minor under sixteen
years of age if a male ... consent
rwhich takes the case out of its purview. Nor is it
necessary that the taking or enticing must be shown to
have been
Islam @ Paltoo vs State Of U.P. on 19 September, 2025
Taking does not need to consist of a single act. A whole series of acts could together constitute the act of taking. Similarly, "entices ... that victim was either enticed or taken by the appellant except making bald allegations of "enticing" and "taking". The victim
Date Of Decision: 30.09.2024 vs State Of Meghalaya on 30 September, 2024
MLHC:890-DB
consent which takes the case out of its purview. Nor is it
necessary that taking or enticing must be shown to have ... taking" can never take place would be too unrealistic and
impermissible. This distinction between "take" and
"entice" cannot certainly
State vs Shiv Kumar on 12 August, 2024
consent which takes the case out of
its purview. Nor is it necessary that the taking or
enticing must be shown to have, been ... accused had refused to take her outside
when she asked him to. Thus, there is no element of taking or enticing
with respect to offence
State vs Shahnawaj on 22 December, 2025
word "takes" is
concerned, observed that the graveman of this offence lies in the taking or enticing
of a minor under the ages ... consent which takes the case
out of its preview nor is it necessarily that the taking or enticing must be shown to
have been
State vs . : Munna Lal on 18 February, 2008
word "takes" is concerned, observed that the graveman of
this offence lies in the taking or enticing of a minor under the
ages ... consent which takes the case out of its preview nor is
it necessarily that the taking or enticing must be shown to have
been