Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Lalita Kumari vs Govt.Of U.P.& Ors on 12 November, 2013 Equivalent citations

entries in the VIIth Schedule and submitted that as far as the NIA Act is concerned it clearly falls within List-II- State List Entry ... which could be said to be covered by the List-I Entry-2A. Thus, this is an enactment dealing with the State crimes and Police

entries in the VIIth Schedule and submitted that as far as the NIA Act is concerned it clearly falls within List-II- State List Entry ... which could be said to be covered by the List-I Entry-2A. Thus, this is an enactment dealing with the State crimes and Police

vide memo Ex. PW-1/E. On 06.01.2003 vide DD entry no. 2A, the police were informed about the death of the injured

2A-0G of Sy.No.667/p came in to the share of Jina Vajsur. That revenue entry no.264 dtd., 20.04.1969 came ... right qua sy. 771/p admeasuring 2A-26G in favor of the petitioner. That revenue entry no.749 dtd. 20.01.1992 came to be mutated

cotton seed was under the purview of Act earlier also but the entry was deleted. There was lacuna and, therefore, the State enacted the Ordinances ... view of Section 2A the "cotton seeds" also. Therefore, considering the entries and the power given to the State Legislature to enact laws

such copy that it is a true copy of such entry, that such entry is contained in one of the ordinary books of the Bank ... accordance with the provisions of Section 2A. 2A. Conditions in the printout.­­A printout of entry or a copy of printout referred

cotton seed was under the purview of Act earlier also but the entry was deleted. There was lacuna and, therefore, the State enacted the Ordinances ... view of Section 2A the "cotton seeds" also. Therefore, considering the entries and the power given to the State Legislature to enact laws

cotton seed was under the purview of Act earlier also but the entry was deleted. There was lacuna and, therefore, the State enacted the Ordinances ... view of Section 2A the "cotton seeds" also. Therefore, considering the entries and the power given to the State Legislature to enact laws

plaintiff was never issued with any notices of the alleged mutation entry bearing M.E.No.3189. Defendants No.1 and 2 have got entered ... share in the suit land R.S.No.65/2A. All the said entries are void and illegal and not binding on the plaintiffs