Abdul Taiyab Abbasbhai Malik And Ors. vs The Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 23 August, 1976
Abdul Taiyab Abbasbhai Malik And Ors. vs The Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on
Search Results Page
Search Results
11 - 20 of 61796 (0.51 seconds)Kali Charan vs State on 1 January, 1800
relate to any illegal detention or to any excessive bail. In fact, these applications related to the three cases of the Farrukhabad district itself ... that if his detention is not illegal the bail required is of such an excessive amount that it is impossible for the applicant to furnish
Chunney Khan @ Firoz @ Firoz Alam vs The State Of U.P. on 29 May, 2020
Mary II. It is in this document that the expression "excessive bail ought not to be required ??."first appears in Chapter 2, clause ... Eighth Amendment to the Constitution which expressly states that, "excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments
Radhey Shyam Dubey [Third Bail] vs U.O.I. Thru. Joint Director,Director ... on 19 July, 2018
Mary II. It is in this document that the expression "excessive bail ought not to be required...." first appears in Chapter 2, clause ... Eighth Amendment to the Constitution which expressly states that, "excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments
Swami Chinmayanand Alias Krishna Pal ... vs State Of U.P. on 3 February, 2020
question arises whether the applicant be granted bail or not ? In this regard, let us examine the Bail in criminal jurisprudence by examining the celebrated ... Eighth Amendment to the Constitution which expressly states that, "excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments
Owners Of Ship Tiong Yung vs Shaw Wallace And Co. Ltd. And Anr. on 1 October, 1987
ground that they could not proceed against anything in excess of the bail granted. The Court of Appeal reversed the said judgment and approved ... owners had contested the claim, the amount decreed was in excess of the bail or security offered earlier for release of the ship. In such
Anna Waman Bhalerao vs State Of Maharashtra on 12 September, 2025
Queen Mary II. It is in this document that the
expression “excessive bail ought not to be required…” first appears in Chapter 2
Clause ... Eighth
Amendment to the Constitution which expressly states that, “excessive bail shall
not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments
inflicted
Suhas Chakma vs Union Of India on 23 October, 2024
OnLine SC 2142 had the following to say on how excessive
bail conditions virtually defeats the bail:-
23. From time immemorial ... principle has been that the excessive
bail is no bail. To grant bail and thereafter to impose excessive and
onerous conditions, is to take away
Girish Gandhi vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 22 August, 2024
State of Haryana is concerned, out of the two FIRs
where bail orders have been obtained, sureties have been furnished ... principle has been that the
excessive bail is no bail. To grant bail and thereafter to impose
excessive and onerous conditions, is to take away
Gajanan Dattatray Gore vs The State Of Maharashtra on 28 July, 2025
condition for bail is not permissible and that the process of
Criminal Law particularly, in matters of grant of bail are not
akin to money ... observed as
under:-
"8. There cannot be any dispute that excessive bail is no
bail and onerous conditions ought not to be imposed while