opposite parties had
taken excess amount of Rs.46,97,460/-. The opposite parties had not done
the works namely: compound wall, flooring, ceiling, painting ... bail. The criminal case is pending against them for
the offence of cheating and extortion. The opposite parties had not only
received an excess amount
factory premises and compound of the insured had receded and
bailed/pumped out of the factory by the insured. On query, the
insured had given ... understand that the flood-water accumulated
in the factory was in excess of 6 ft. height. However, upon
inspection, surveyor had seen the tell-tale
this
Rs.40,000/- to counter his arrest in addition to an excess payment of Rs.44819/-.
An added grievance is he was charged ... which after moving from pillar to post he had to get his
bail. Another grievance of the Appellant/Complainant is the Ld. DCDRF
Mr Amir Ali Tharani vs Mr Rajesh Sukhtnkar on 27 September, 2010
BEFORE THE HON
also increased. The area was water logged; substantial amount was spent for bailing out water. The complainant later found that there are no prospective buyers ... understanding that complainant will bear the cost of extra work or excessive work. There was understanding that payment will be made in advance. The site
lakhs lying in the savings bank
account of the complainant towards excess withdrawal of Rs. Three lakh and had
filed an original application bearing ... retain as a security for a general balance of account, any goods
bailed to them; but no other person have a right to retain
Mr. Shailendra Kumar, Son Of Shri. ... vs Mr. Jagdish A. Dialani, Sole Prop. Of ... on
Vijaya Health Centre vs K. Karibeeran (Deceased) & Ors. on 25 March, 2026
IN THE
Dr. Hariharan vs Sundari @ Rajathi & Anr. on 25 March, 2026
IN THE NATIONAL CONSUMER
Anil Sharma vs Bhagat Multispecialty Hospital on 5 March, 2024
Cause Title/Judgement-Entry STATE
