that the applicant possessed disproportionate
assets of Rs. 24 lakhs in excess of his known sources of
income. Thereafter, on 23.02.2002, he was arrested ... applicant states that
during April, 2002 after the applicant got released on bail,
he made a representation against a motivated FIR and
deemed suspension
Court (Prevention of Corruption Act), Raipur.
Thereafter, he was released on bail on 14.05.2022 on
certain conditions by the Hon'ble High Court ... mainly
on the charges of acquisition of movable and immovable
property in excess of known sources of income, attempt to
destroy evidence, attempts to create
interim bail was granted to him on 14.12.2012 itself
and the regular bail was granted and sentence was suspended
by the Hon'ble High ... respondents
that the applicant had drawn full salary upto 31.07.2013 in
excess to the salary/allowance permissible to him for the
period
interim bail was granted to him on 14.12.2012 itself
and the regular bail was granted and sentence was suspended
by the Hon'ble High ... respondents
that the applicant had drawn full salary upto 31.07.2013 in
excess to the salary/allowance permissible to him for the
period
held
that in case the assets possessed by the accused
in excess of the surplus income are less than 10%
of the total income ... case on hand, the accused's possession of excess
assets to the tune of 7.02% of total income during
the check period falls short
shall be entitled to subsistence allowance from the date he is granted bail. The counsel for the respondents further contends that the subsistence allowance payable ... concerned, he is right in contending that on suspension period being in excess of 90 days the authority, which made the suspension order, should have
that should be imposed on the Government servant, which should not be excessive or disproportionate to the offence committed. The Disciplinary Authority would call ... agitate in appeal that the penalty was too severe or excessive and not warranted by the facts and circumstances of the case
being C.P.Fund deducted in
excess on account of excess salary of Rs.4,47,912/- (Basic ... appellants have no
criminal record; even after their having been released on bail
the appellants have continued to reside peacefully in the
neighbourhood; and taking
concerned, he is right in contending that on suspension period being in excess of 90 days the authority, which made the suspension order, should have ... subsistence allowance was payable to the applicant till he was granted bail is out of context to the issue of enhancement of subsistence allowance
Si Anant Kiran vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 14 October, 2011
Central Administrative
