opposite parties had
taken excess amount of Rs.46,97,460/-. The opposite parties had not done
the works namely: compound wall, flooring, ceiling, painting ... bail. The criminal case is pending against them for
the offence of cheating and extortion. The opposite parties had not only
received an excess amount
requested to bail him out
of the present situation. He was informed that after working out the actual
amount excess paid amount, the mode
closing stock of bails at
Rs.13,99,532/- and weighing 237 quintals i.e. 148 bales, these bales are in
excess of 100 bales
Reliance Infocomm Limited vs Union Of India (Uoi) (Dot) on 4 March, 2005
ORDER
1
penalty cannot be imposed in this case and it is too excessive. He submits that even otherwise, as the appellants have not indulged ... further submits that the appellant A.B. Mehta had been released on bail without the strong opposition from the department and submits that this
Complainant, without any authorisation / request from him, merely because it had made excess payment towards salary for the notice period to the complainant.
5. Section ... retain as a security for a general balance of account, any goods bailed to them. The aforesaid section came up for consideration
also
contended that the quantum of penalty imposed was excessive
and therefore urged that if an opportunity was given to the
appellants they would ... appellants. We find that the Appellant No. 6 was released
on bail on July 24, 2018 and thereafter the AO granted several
opportunities vide notices
that the applicant possessed disproportionate
assets of Rs. 24 lakhs in excess of his known sources of
income. Thereafter, on 23.02.2002, he was arrested ... applicant states that
during April, 2002 after the applicant got released on bail,
he made a representation against a motivated FIR and
deemed suspension
Hari Om Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs Cgst Kanpur on 25 June, 2025
CUSTOMS, EXCISE &
National Solar Energy Federation Of ... vs Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory ... on 28 November, 2022
Appeal
