that these items are "organic manure" and not
covered within FCO, 1985 and as such no licence was
needed under the FCO ... what is not "organic manure" within
the meaning of FCO 1985 and his opinion should be
taken to be the opinion
Consumer Forums.
29. More over, Section -127(2)' of _..the.AA.fCo'nsumer
Protection Act,_o'pens
conferspovifer Government to
issue notificationpto relating to
the transaction eftlie .fCo~ojp_erative Society upto monetary limit
fixed by i_sI'iie.2oo6
Regency Tower
Near Management Enclave
Vastrapur
Ahmedabad. .... .. Complainants
Versus
1. Ahmedabad fCo.OperatiVe Department Stores Ltd._,
Having its office at
Apna Bazar,
Multistoried Building
B Raghurama Prabhu Estate vs Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax on 23 December, 2010
Equivalent
Ilc Industries Ltd. vs State Of Karnataka on 2 November, 2010
Equivalent citations: 2011 (3
matter Director of
the respondent » by 3.8.2000 called
upon the applica.nt~fco'mpan'%.:'\"tto_' play' cognvtribution
accused in"*the,_Trial"Co't!rt»...V_:Fco:r"the first time, in this Court this
objection hasiheen,Vrais
opined that the sample is NOT according to the specification of
FCO, 1985. The sample fails in available Phosphorus and Water Soluble
Phosphorus. Hence
2297/2002:
BETWEEN: .
M/s. United India Insuranc_e:fCo.'_Ltd;.,. i ,_
Regional Office, No.25, Shankarnairafyana. _ -.
Building, M.G.Road, Bangalore
