extent, the Official Liquidator
be discharged from his duties and the Receiver, DRT be also discharged from his
duties. This application was preferred ... that as it had lost faith in
the functioning of the Receiver appointed by the DRT and the Court had by an order
dated
inferred.
24. In contrast, in the context of case at hand, the DRT is a creature
of RDB Act. It is empowered to exercise ... statute, the Tribunal has limited jurisdiction. It has to discharge
the statutory functions within the four-corners of the statute creating it.
The Tribunal, thus
inferred.
24. In contrast, in the context of case at hand, the DRT is a creature
of RDB Act. It is empowered to exercise ... statute, the Tribunal has limited jurisdiction. It has to discharge
the statutory functions within the four-corners of the statute creating it.
The Tribunal, thus
inferred.
24. In contrast, in the context of case at hand, the DRT is a creature
of RDB Act. It is empowered to exercise ... statute, the Tribunal has limited jurisdiction. It has to discharge
the statutory functions within the four-corners of the statute creating it.
The Tribunal, thus
inferred.
24. In contrast, in the context of case at hand, the DRT is a creature
of RDB Act. It is empowered to exercise ... statute, the Tribunal has limited jurisdiction. It has to discharge
the statutory functions within the four-corners of the statute creating it.
The Tribunal, thus
inferred.
24. In contrast, in the context of case at hand, the DRT is a creature
of RDB Act. It is empowered to exercise ... statute, the Tribunal has limited jurisdiction. It has to discharge
the statutory functions within the four-corners of the statute creating it.
The Tribunal, thus
inferred.
24. In contrast, in the context of case at hand, the DRT is a creature
of RDB Act. It is empowered to exercise ... statute, the Tribunal has limited jurisdiction. It has to discharge
the statutory functions within the four-corners of the statute creating it.
The Tribunal, thus
inferred.
24. In contrast, in the context of case at hand, the DRT is a creature
of RDB Act. It is empowered to exercise ... statute, the Tribunal has limited jurisdiction. It has to discharge
the statutory functions within the four-corners of the statute creating it.
The Tribunal, thus
inferred.
24. In contrast, in the context of case at hand, the DRT is a creature
of RDB Act. It is empowered to exercise ... statute, the Tribunal has limited jurisdiction. It has to discharge
the statutory functions within the four-corners of the statute creating it.
The Tribunal, thus
inferred.
24. In contrast, in the context of case at hand, the DRT is a creature
of RDB Act. It is empowered to exercise ... statute, the Tribunal has limited jurisdiction. It has to discharge
the statutory functions within the four-corners of the statute creating it.
The Tribunal, thus
