Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (2.17 seconds)

Aniket Jain vs Branch Manager on 4 May, 2026

being preferred before DRT, Jabalpur, after proceedings under Section 14 of the Act, 2002 is culminated. However, DRT, Jabalpur being not functional, it rendered ... within a month from the date DRT becomes functional and this interim arrangement shall be applicable and effective for one month only from the date
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - A Pathak - Full Document

Seema Gupta vs Union Bank Of India on 5 May, 2026

decided by DRT, Jabalpur. No Presiding Officer is available and DRT is not functional, therefore, this petition is preferred. 3. Although counsel for the respondent ... rules, however, sympathetically looking to the nature of loan. (vi) Whenever DRT becomes functional and Presiding Officer is available, then petitioners shall have to press
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - A Pathak - Full Document
1   2 3 Next