appeals pending with DRT, the appellant may follow the laid down DRT procedures.
The appeal is disposed of.
3. Case No. CIC/MP/C/2016 ... personal opinion of the CPIO. Moreover, the
rules under which the DRT functions also prohibit DRT to provide information on
pending judicial cases
appeals pending with DRT, the appellant may follow the laid down DRT procedures.
The appeal is disposed of.
3. Case No. CIC/MP/C/2016 ... personal opinion of the CPIO. Moreover, the
rules under which the DRT functions also prohibit DRT to provide information on
pending judicial cases
appeals pending with DRT, the appellant may follow the laid down DRT procedures.
The appeal is disposed of.
3. Case No. CIC/MP/C/2016 ... personal opinion of the CPIO. Moreover, the
rules under which the DRT functions also prohibit DRT to provide information on
pending judicial cases
empowered to exercise
jurisdiction over DRTs and DRATs to oversee their functioning.
vi. Whirlpool Corporation Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai ... Haryana High
Court related to adequate space for the smooth functioning of DRT at
Chandigarh. Thus, the matter was directly related to the
administration
determined by DRT the property remains custodia-
legis. Even after coming into force of the DRT Act and the DRT the
said rights ... held by the
Receiver remain undecided and, therefore, till DRT appoints its
Receiver under the DRT Act, 1993 this Court can certainly issue
directions
that extent
it discharges the judicial functions of the State, inasmuch as the DRT/DRAT decide the „lis‟
between the Banks/Financial Institutions and their
situation when the Debts Recovery Tribunal(for short 'the DRT')
was not function at Jaipur and the examinations of students of the
petitioners ... Interest Act, 2002(for short 'the
SARFAESI Act ') before the DRT, but the DRT has not decided the
same and examinations approached near
petitioner, the petition was filed in
the DRT-II, which did not function for several years after 2011.
Even though such aspect of the petitioner ... what is
evident is that the matter was transferred by DRT-II to DRT-III
in 2014 and it came to be re-numbered
that the DRAT is now
functional and if the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the DRT,
she can file an appeal before ... DRAT is functional, it is for the petitioner to
approach the said forum for assailing the order dated 6.5.2017 passed by the
DRT, in accordance
auction is fixed today
and the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) is not functional as the
Presiding Officer is on leave, therefore, interim order be granted
