want of prosecution vide order
Annexure P-8. The DRT-III should have issued notice to the petitioner with
regard to pendency ... India can
always interfere in such like illegal orders passed by DRT functioning within
the territorial jurisdiction of this Court. In the given circumstances
issued by the DRT
DRT-II.
II. The
matter is now adjourned to 02.04.2025 but as the DRT-II is not functioning due
to want ... that the proposal for extending the additional charge of DRT
DRT-II
II to
DRT-II has been sent to the Appointments Committee
However, the same is not being listed due
to non-functioning of DRT-II. The petitioners have also preferred a
miscellaneous application before the DRAT ... submits that the proposal for extending the additional
charge of DRT-II to DRT-I has been sent to the Appointments Committee of
the Cabinet
preferring
securitization application (S.A.) before DRT-II
DRT II and as DRT
DRT-II
II is not functioning
at present, he be protected till ... DRT-II
DRT II resumes its functioning. He also submits
that he will file S.A. within a week. He also submits that
2024 before the DRT-II,
DRT II, Chandigarh which cannot be listed and
heard as DRT-II
DRT I is not functioning at present ... petitioner
for a period of 15 days after the DRT-II
DRT resumes its functioning.
7. In the meantime, petitioner would be at liberty
functioning of DRT-II.
DRT He submits that petitioners may be protected till DRT
DRT-II
II
resumes its functioning.
2. Heard ... petitioners are protected for some time till the DRT-II resumes
its functioning.
5. The petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioners
Chandigarh which is not being taken up for want of functioning of
the DRT-II.
I. He submits that petitioner may be protected till Securitization ... stated to have filed SA before the DRT
DRT-II,
and due to its non-functioning,
non functioning, the same is not being taken
time when concerned Debt Recovery Tribunal (for short
DRT) was not functional as Presiding Officer had not been appointed.
Petitioner ... necessitated as
concerned DRT was not functional. Admittedly, as of now DRT is
functional. In this view of the matter, all three writ petitions
functioning of DRT-II. She submits that petitioner may be protected till DRT-II
resumes its functioning.
2. Heard.
3. It is settled law that ... submits that the proposal for extending the additional charge
of DRT-II to DRT-I has been sent to the Appointments Committee of the
Cabinet
functioning of DRT-II. He submits that petitioners may be protected till
the DRT-II resumes its functioning.
2. Heard.
3. It is settled ... submits that the proposal for extending the additional charge
of DRT-II to DRT-I has been sent to the Appointments Committee of the
Cabinet
