passed and enacted.
1.1.6 Sugar industry witnessed remarkable growth from 139 sugar factories in operation
......,._
in 1950-51 producing 11 lakh tonnes of sugar ... llllfilfiihgar factories producing
[K] ,_.'r/\ ,.y ' \\§
(5 1,
[under sugarcane also
saw
hectayjes
Commissioner of Sugar (who is also the Registrar of Co-op. Sugar Factories representing the State) is liable to be disallowed Under Section ... Special Bench. He explained briefly the history of Co-operative Sugar Factories. It was submitted that the issue whether non-refundable deposits and refundable deposits
Sugar Factories Ltd. And Ors. vs Cce on 1 January, 2004
Equivalent citations: 2004(93)ECC224, 2004(165)ELT161
being carried on in some premises registered as s factory under the Factories Act . He also submitted that the Hon'ble Supreme Court
collected by the Bag Collecting Agents of the respective cement factories (to be collected by them at the consumers' work site on 'Cash ... Order, Release Orders were issued by Regional Cement Officer to various cement factories for supply of the stated quantity of cement to bulk consumers
basis of value of the goods cleared from each of the three factories severally owned by the Appellant in each of the Appeals; (hereinafter called ... Appellants, should the clearances from all three of the factories be aggregated and cumulatively considered for extension of the benefit of the notification, since
Sugar Factories Ltd vs Cce, Meerut on 22 September, 2009
IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
West Block ... passed by the Commissioner(Appeals), Meerut)
M/s. L.H.Sugar Factories Ltd. Appellant
Versus
CCE, Meerut Respondent
Appearance
Sh. Kapil Vaish, CA For Appellant
Meerut-Ii vs M/S. L.H. Sugar Factories Ltd on 3 March, 2008
IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
WEST BLOCK ... Departmental authorities?
CCE, Meerut-II Appellant
Vs.
M/s. L.H. Sugar Factories Ltd. Respondents
Appearance:
Ms. Archana P. Tiwari, Jt.CDR for the Revenue
consideration are during the period July 2006 to December 2009, various factories of the appellant had availed CENVAT credit in respect of services like construction ... respect of the services rendered at residential complex/township of the factories. It is his further submission that these residential complex/townships were attached with
audited and overseen by the statutory authorities including the Chief
Inspector of Factories (CIFs), Department of Industries, the District
Magistrate, the State ... under item No. 17
and 18 of the First schedule of the Factories Act, 1948 and the nature
of the manufacturing process falls under section
