experience (Three years of working experience)
to be appointed as a principal. It is the contention of the
management that the appellant produced fake documents ... years experience at the time of appointment.
The appellant produced a fake experience
certificate and that would render the appellant
unfit for the post
experience (Three years of working experience)
to be appointed as a principal. It is the contention of the
management that the appellant produced fake documents ... years experience at the time of appointment.
The appellant produced a fake experience
certificate and that would render the appellant
unfit for the post
Petitioner has admitted to his mistake of
fabricating a fake relieving letter and a fake
experience certificate on the letterhead of the
Respondent ... Director of the Respondent
No.2 on the said fake relieving letter and fake
experience certificate and tendered an unconditional
apology.
3. The 2nd Respondent
issue notice and provide
opportunity of hearing when allegations of furnishing fake
experience certificate was grave charge having severe
ramifications. On said ground learned counsel ... material condition was
one year's experience. To satisfy said condition, petitioner had
relied upon experience certificate issued by one Sri P.K. Shefi
issue notice and provide
opportunity of hearing when allegations of furnishing fake
experience certificate was grave charge having severe
ramifications. On said ground learned counsel ... material condition was
one year's experience. To satisfy said condition, petitioner had
relied upon experience certificate issued by one Sri P.K. Shefi
Sullia, Dakshina Kannada, in the Department of
OBG, she obtained a false experience certificate from accused
No.5 to the effect that she worked therein ... documents obtained by accused No.1 with regard to her
experience being fake and fabricated and these documents
having been issued at the instance
counsel for the
petitioner would contend that the experience certificate
produced by 3rd respondent is fake and is not issued by
appropriate person. Learned counsel ... contention of the petitioner that
experience certificate produced by respondent No.3 is fake
7
and fabricated one. Learned counsel for the petitioner would
submit
experience, but the Indian Oil Corporation -
respondent No.2, awarded the full "4" marks earmarked
for experience based on such fake certificate.
Consequentially
Experience Certificate
from defendant No.3 and Defendant No.1, being Branch
Manager of defendant No.3, issued the Satisfaction and
Experience Certificate ... Commissioner, Bagalkot, stating that the Satisfaction &
Experience Certificate enclosed by the plaintiff is fake and
forged and sought to cancel plaintiff's tender
inter alia
contending that the 3rd respondent had produced fake
5
certificate regarding his experience and therefore, he could
not have been awarded full ... through
its Field Officer, revealed that the experience certificate
produced by the 3rd respondent was not fake. It was
submitted by the learned Counsel that
