Track Courts were lying vacant, and 23 adhoc appointees were working on the post of Clerk and Stenographers in regular Courts as well as Fast ... respect of the employees working in Fast Track Court on 1.3.2011 when the Fast Track Courts were ceased in UP. It was recommended that
adjustment of Fast Track Court' employees in same Judgeship or other Judgeship subject to the condition that if the Fast Track Courts are revived ... Fast Track Court employees, who were already working and were engaged for limited duration i.e. till the existence of the Fast Track Courts
basis as Additional District Judges against ad-hoc posts created in Fast Track Courts. At that time there were no substantive vacancies in the Higher
Fast Track Court Scheme was brought in to deal with the exigency and the appellants were appointed to the Fast Track Courts and continued ... Fast Track Court Scheme was brought in to deal with the exigency and the appellants were appointed to the Fast Track Courts and continued
Court Allahabad and another ........ Respondents
******************
Hon'ble Tarun Agarwala,J.
Fast Track Courts were established all over the country including the State of Uttar ... year to year. By a notification dated 28th February, 2005, the Fast Track Courts were abolished. As a result, the services of the petitioner came
Ashok Kumar Nigam vs State Of U.P. & Ors. on 16 June, 2010
Bench
made till such time as all the appointments made in the Fast Track Courts are adjusted. It is for this reason that ... would be made till such time as all appointments made to Fast Track Courts had been adjusted. Since the aforesaid order of the State Government
appellant-petitioners against their discontinuance as Clerks in the Fast Track Courts, established at District Ghazipur in Uttar Pradesh on 5.8.2022. Thus aggrieved, the appellants ... these Fast Track Courts and these ad-hoc appointees may be posted in other courts so as to make these courts more effective and functional
irregular.
In reference of employees who have been working in
Fast Track Courts under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief
Justice Committee ... Fast Track Court was not involved
because the Hon'ble Committee is yet to consider the matter
of absorption of employees of Fast track
Sanjay Sahu, who were initially appointed as Ad-hoc Peshkar in Fast Track Courts under appointment orders dated 1st July, 2002 and dated 4th September ... Sanjay Sahu, who were initially, appointed as Ad-hoc Peshkar in Fast Track Courts, and have since been regularized. Therefore, petitioners are also entitled
