ambit of Section 10 of the Evidence Act.”
Likewise, in Firozuddin Basheeruddin & Ors. v. State of Kerala [3], this
Court discussed
Cc No. 31/2009 Cbi vs . B. S. Meena & Ors. Page 1 Of 91
ambit of
Section 10 of the Evidence Act.”
25) Likewise, in Firozuddin Basheeruddin & Ors. v. State of
Kerala3 , this Court discussed
following statement of law made by the Supreme Court in Firozuddin Basheeruddin v. State of Kerala ((2001) 7 SCC 596) may be relevant
about the involvement of all the accused. That is why in Firozuddin Basheeruddin v. State of Kerala ((2001) 7 SCC 596) it is held
Cc No.14/2008 Cbi vs . M.B. Pahari Etc. Page 1 Of 71 on
Cbi vs . Bhupesh Chandra Patel Etc. on 14 May, 2015
:: 1 ::
IN THE COURT OF
Muriappan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, AIR 2010 SC 3718
and Firozuddin Basheeruddin Vs. State of Kerala , (2001) 7 SCC 596.
CC No. 33/2008
State of Maharastra v. Som Nath Thapa
1996( 4) SCC 659, Firozuddin Basheeruddin v. State
of Kerala , (2001) 7 SCC 596).
"The gist
State of Maharastra v. Som Nath Thapa
1996( 4) SCC 659, Firozuddin Basheeruddin v. State
of Kerala , (2001) 7 SCC 596).
"The gist