Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.97 seconds)

Anil Rishi vs Income Tax on 28 November, 2020

However, it convicted them under Sections 420, 471 and 120 B IPC vide judgement dated 16.5.2011 (Annexure A- 17). This ... termination of services of the applicants was the criminal charge relating to forgery in getting appointment launched by the CBI in which the applicants have
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajdeep Singh vs Chandigarh Police, Ut on 19 May, 2022

committed an offence punishable under section 120-B of Indian Penal Code, and within my cognizance. Secondly, you accused Sanjeev Mahajan, in the month ... Singh 12 committed an offence punishable under section 120-B of Indian Penal Code, and within my cognizance. Thirdly, in the month of April
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Avtar Singh vs Income Tax on 10 April, 2024

applicants however were acquitted of the charge under Section 468 of IPC. 8. The applicants submit in OA that since he basis ... allegations in the said CBI case were as under: "Accused through forgery and fake documents managed to secure appointments of Income Tax Inspectors, Stenos
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mukesh Kumar Chhatwal vs Income Tax on 10 April, 2024

applicants however were acquitted of the charge under Section 468 of IPC. 8. The applicants submit in OA that since he basis ... allegations in the said CBI case were as under: "Accused through forgery and fake documents managed to secure appointments of Income Tax Inspectors, Stenos
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next