Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (1.10 seconds)

Dharmesh R Gathani vs Ahmedabad on 2 August, 2022

appellant or anybody from Appellant's company was aware of the forgery of 93 licences and its documents sold through them by Shri Kalpesh ... Indian Penal Code. We also noticed from the submission of Appellant that M/s Hindalco had also lodged FIR against all the Directors
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 40 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dcw Ltd vs Commissioner Of Customs on 11 June, 2015

company on principle to principle basis there is no fraud or forgery and it can be established only after cross-examining of the persons concerned ... Delhi - 1997 (94) ELT 289 (SC). He submitted that regarding forgery, it is a criminal offence where Section 463 of IPC is attracted
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vikash Kumar vs Kolkata-Prev on 6 February, 2026

signed by the exporters and by the Appellant or by others through forgery. One cannot blow hot and cold in one mouth at a time ... containing signature of the concerned exporters, which establishes that the allegation of forgery on which impugned orders are passed are far from reality. (xvii
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vikash Kumar vs Kolkata-Prev on 6 February, 2026

signed by the exporters and by the Appellant or by others through forgery. One cannot blow hot and cold in one mouth at a time ... containing signature of the concerned exporters, which establishes that the allegation of forgery on which impugned orders are passed are far from reality. (xvii
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vikash Kumar vs Kolkata-Prev on 6 February, 2026

signed by the exporters and by the Appellant or by others through forgery. One cannot blow hot and cold in one mouth at a time ... containing signature of the concerned exporters, which establishes that the allegation of forgery on which impugned orders are passed are far from reality. (xvii
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vikash Kumar vs Kolkata-Prev on 6 February, 2026

signed by the exporters and by the Appellant or by others through forgery. One cannot blow hot and cold in one mouth at a time ... containing signature of the concerned exporters, which establishes that the allegation of forgery on which impugned orders are passed are far from reality. (xvii
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

S. No vs Unknown on 15 February, 2016

unreasonably bring the appellant to consequence of penalty. There was no forgery of DEPB scrips or TRA done by the appellant. 6.4 Learned Commissioner ... prosecution filing complaint against him under Section 174 & 175 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 108 of the Customs
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Chinta Haran Ojha Cha vs New Delhi on 12 March, 2020

goods as paper roll and Terminal (parts of payment debit/credit device), forgery of invoice, undervaluation and non-inclusion of the value of software ... goods; that only importer can be penalized for rendering goods liable for confiscation; that he cannot be penalized for wrongdoings of importers in absence
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - D Gupta - Full Document
1   2 3 Next