Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 116 (0.01 seconds)

M/S Saroj Overseas Pvt. Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance Co. ... on 30 January, 2024

shall be initiated against the complainant respondent under Section 466 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 which deals with Forgery of Court Record or of public ... actions shall be initiated against the respondent under Section 466 of Indian Penal Code, 1860; on 07.11.2023 after due deliberations and considerations of all material
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Saroj Overseas Pvt. Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance Co. ... on 30 January, 2024

shall be initiated against the complainant respondent under Section 466 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 which deals with Forgery of Court Record or of public ... actions shall be initiated against the respondent under Section 466 of Indian Penal Code, 1860; on 07.11.2023 after due deliberations and considerations of all material
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Saroj Overseas Pvt. Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance Co. ... on 30 January, 2024

shall be initiated against the complainant respondent under Section 466 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 which deals with Forgery of Court Record or of public ... actions shall be initiated against the respondent under Section 466 of Indian Penal Code, 1860; on 07.11.2023 after due deliberations and considerations of all material
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Saroj Overseas Pvt. Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance Co. ... on 30 January, 2024

shall be initiated against the complainant respondent under Section 466 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 which deals with Forgery of Court Record or of public ... actions shall be initiated against the respondent under Section 466 of Indian Penal Code, 1860; on 07.11.2023 after due deliberations and considerations of all material
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Renu Goel vs Icici Bank on 30 November, 2023

Commission is not a proper forum for deciding the controversy of fraud, forgery and cheating appears to be tenable. Counsel for OP has relied upon ... fraud, forgery and cheating, which constitutes offences, as defined under the Indian Penal Code . Even before this Commission, the Appellant is placing reliance
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mrs. Tara Rao vs Hsbc Bank Ltd. on 7 March, 2023

same being read with Section 34, Section 120B etc of the Indian Penal Code . It is clearly submitted that the complainant has not signed knowingly ... same being read with Section 34 , Section120B of the Indian Penal Code and prays for compensation. Per-contra, the Opposite Parties have denied the same
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next