Dr.Mcr.Vyas vs The Inspector Of Police on 6 August, 2014
Author: Aruna Jagadeesan
document or the authenticity of the digital signature, with the intention of causing it to be believed that such document or part of document, electronic ... with fine, or with both.
469. Forgery for purpose of harming reputation- Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document or electronic record forged shall harm
respondent contends that the title was acquired by a forged document, forgery would be put in issue and it would be necessary to decide
seals or executes a document or part of a document, or makes any mark denoting the execution of a document, with the intention of causing ... Forged document" is defined under Sec. 470 I. P. C. A false document made wholly or in part by forgery is designated
would be a strained thinking that any offence involving forgery of a document if committed far outside the precincts of the Court and long before ... upon administration of justice. It is possible that such forged document or forgery may cause a very serious or substantial injury to a person
Cases involving serious and specific allegations of fraud,
fabrication of documents, forgery, impersonation, coercion etc.
(v) Cases requiring protection of courts, as for example, claims
forged such document. Section 470 defines
a forged document as a false document made by
forgery.
9. The term "forgery" used in these ... offence
under Section 467 and 471 is forgery. The
condition precedent for forgery is making a false
document (or false electronic record or part
thereof
CrPC would not apply where the forgery of a document was committed before the said document was produced in court. Accordingly, the revision petition ... clear that for taking cognizance of an offence, the document, the foundation for forgery, if produced before the court or given Page 1070 in evidence
which according to him, would substantiate his say regarding the forgery of the document. We will deal with the same at the time when ... first contention of Mr. Parikh regarding forgery of the document at Exh. 207 is concerned, he has drawn our attention to various documents contained
Code is
not applicable to a case where
forgery of the document was committed
before the document was produced in a
court. Accordingly we dismiss ... note that
observations have been made by this Court that
forgery of a document if committed far outside
the precincts of the Court and long