2020 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120b, CCB Document Forgery
109 Wing
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Page ... 2020 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, CCB Document Forgery Wing
120b, 109 of IPC .,
Apart from this, several complaints were received against the fifth
judis/
Crl.O.P.No.8332 of 2021
Attorney in Document No.110/2003 in SRO Office at Triplicane. In
pursuance of the General Power ... Document No.210/2004 on
06.05.2004. Thereafter, the petitioner created forgery document on
30.12.2005 in Doc.No.640 of 2005 and using the forgerd document
accused is that the accused by impersonating other persons
created a forgery document. As soon as a report is received from the
Forensic Department, final
apparent that offence of forgery and cheating have been
committed. Further, the complaint is submitted along with 9
documents, which is not denied. The petitioner ... officials of TNHB, in
collusion with such persons, executed a forgery document, further
following this document, two more documents
Senthilkumar
usurped 3.15 acres of the said property. Now, using the forgery
document, the said Senthilkumar is living in the said estate, under the
guise ... Senthilkumar
abducted 3.15 acres of the said property. Then, using the forgery
document, the said Senthilkumar is living in the said estate, under the
guise
Senthilkumar
usurped 3.15 acres of the said property. Now, using the forgery
document, the said Senthilkumar is living in the said estate, under the
guise
Senthilkumar
abducted 3.15 acres of the said property. Then, using the forgery
document, the said Senthilkumar is living in the said estate and under
Civil Court. Further, for the purpose of
proving the forgery, the original documents have to be perused, which
was not done in this case ... stated that only the certified copy of
the document has been produced, by which the forgery of the petitioner's
signature cannot be proved
Civil Court. Further, for the purpose of
proving the forgery, the original documents have to be perused, which
was not done in this case ... stated that only the certified copy of
the document has been produced, by which the forgery of the petitioner's
signature cannot be proved
property based on the correction
and forgery made in the Government records. During investigation, in the
document produced by the 1st petitioner in connection with ... claiming right over the property based on the
forged documents. Further, using the forged document, the 1st petitioner filed
a civil suit
