Shri Chaudhary pointed out that the petitioners are guilty of forgery of various documents filed before this Hon'ble Board. The allotment of shares ... Paliwal only and there is no forgery on the various documents signed by Mr. JK Paliwal. Further, the report given by Mr Ashok Kashyap filed
duly signed by the Respondents are in possession of the petitioners. These documents were shown in original during the course of hearing ... alleged that respondents are also liable for forgery for having fabricated several documents to prove their case, the original thereof were not available and that
wife and therefore no credence should be placed on these documents. When the 2nd respondent relied on the certified copies of the Annual Returns signed ... rely on the shareholding of his group, the 1st petitioner alleged, again, forgery. In regard to the gift/transfer of 3500 shares to the Trust
motive, purpose and objective of the respondent for engineering of the document, (vi) In a quasi-partnership company, it is well established proposition that whenever ... alleged receipt of payment of Rs. 60 lacs is a mere forgery because: (a) Mr. Vishwajeet Shahi petitioner no 3 who has allegedly issued
indulged in forgery. The SAHRDC Trust has filed a criminal complaint against the petitioner contending commission of offence of forgery, which is pending trial before ... Tribal Peoples Network Publication titled "Racism Against Indigenous Peoples" IWGIA Document, 2001 in the year 2001. It was also found that the petitioner
drawn to handwriting expert's (Pt. Ashok Kashyap) report evidencing the forgery It was pointed out that the report of handwriting expert ... placed on record by the Respondents suffered from several discrepancies; Documents received (Q1 and Q2) when compared (Marked
Respondent No. 1 Company. Further, the petitioner has committed offence of cheating, forgery by opening current account in Karur Vysya Bank, A.B. Road, Indore ... against petitioner for opening aforesaid forged account with the help of forged documents it was decided to make payments in favour of creditors of Respondent
fabricated document and the submissions made by the respondents in their replies are not true statements with regard to the authenticity of the documents ... that the Memorandum of Understanding dated 10.3.1995 is a forged and fabricated document which was so forged by the respondents to be produced
Police Station Sarabha Nagar, Ludhiana and as the CFSL had confirmed the forgery of the allotted letter of resignation dated 31.5.2001, the Respondents had approached ... bail is granted subject to the condition that none of the disputed documents like letter of resignation dated May 31, 2001 and the Memorandum
Ms. Heena Dutt vs Chavi Designs Pvt. Ltd. And Mr. Sandeep ... on 22 May, 2007
