said certificate
dated 05.08.1999 placed on record is a forged and fabricated document
prepared by the appellant and said Rajinderpal Singh. Regarding this fraud ... balance as 'NIL'. There is
allegation of forgery and fabrication of the documents and the District Forum
has no jurisdiction. Complicated questions
complainant necessarily obtain an attested copy of the document along with an authentication that original document has been lost irrecoverably and after due publication ... commit a crime of cheating and forgery. In our opinion as per serious scrutiny of the document, the contents of the handwriting, signature and various
tampering of the documents has been committed by the
respondents before the Forum. If the respondents have forged some
documents after the decision ... case. No tampering or forgery is alleged to be committed by the respondents
with the documents of the court file. If the respondents have later
tampering of the documents has been committed by the
respondents before the Forum. If the respondents have forged some
documents after the decision ... case. No tampering or forgery is alleged to be committed by the respondents
with the documents of the court file. If the respondents have later
appellant has not been able to
rebut these documents. Just taking the plea of forgery is not sufficient to
prove the same. The appellant
which he did not choose to do so. If forgery and fabrication of the documents
are alleged by the complainant, in fact, he ought
anomalies
and fabrication/forgery. The signatures of Sandeep Kaur and her Mamaji
were forged on the consent letter and several other documents were also
forged ... hand writing expert
who reported vide Annexure C64 that it was a forgery. The matter was also
reported to the police and a criminal case
loan and execution of documents. The appellant
has suppressed material facts and has levelled allegations of fraud and
forgery against the bank officials
verification of his signatures, he denied having signed any policy document as Life Assured. It was further stated that the Opposite
Parties forged the signatures ... documents. It was further stated
that the complainant sent a letter on 12.4.2012, Annexure C-8, to Opposite
Party No.2, and demanded the documents
opening the returned cover opposite party found the
forged documents instead of original documents and other papers actually sent
for collection and thereby ... Further the documents as returned by PNC Bank 505 Thronall Street, 4th
Floor, Edison NJ also clearly indicate the forgery as stated in point
