Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 31 (0.03 seconds)

State vs Ranvir & Ors. on 3 March, 2009

forged document. Forgery has been defined U/S 463 IPC which read as under:- Section-463 IPC Forgery-[Whoever makes any false documents or false ... reads as under :- Section : 468 IPC Forgery for purpose of cheating:- Whoever commits forgery, intending that the [document of electronic record forged] shall be used
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Cbi vs Asgar Abbas Rizvi, Etc on 17 July, 2007

been able to prove on record the alleged forgery of the alleged documents by way of leading evidence of forensic expert in this regard; that ... provides as under: 468. Forgery for purpose of cheating - '' Whoever commits forgery, intending that the [document or electronic record forged] shall be used
Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Pawan Etc on 16 November, 2013

vide Ex. PW5/C. 8.2 The fabrication and forgery of documents were done outside the Court i.e before their production before the Court ... accused on the basis of forged and fabricated documents. 8.8 The impersonation and fabrication of fake documents was done by both the accused persons
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Pawan Etc on 20 November, 2013

vide Ex. PW2/C. 8.2 The fabrication and forgery of documents were done outside the Court i.e before their production before the Court ... forgery and impersonation was only detected when actual Vijay Bansal appeared and stated about the said forgery. The forged and fabricated documents were fraudulently used
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

R/O Wz-83 vs Satish Kumar on 19 September, 2020

making a false document elaborating om the essentials of forgery by preparation of a document as: A person is said to make a false document ... witness fram NDPL for him to identity the document. Moreover, the original document was already destroyed by the thme the testimony was recorded. The signatures
Delhi District Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Akila Vijayakumar vs The State Represented By

also taken and clubbed together and the Special Team regarding Forgery and Fraudulent Documents Provisions Wing had proceeded with the investigation. 7. The learned Government ... signature containing document and the disputed signature of late Bhuvarahan. It has given an opinion that the signature found on the document in question
Madras High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - S S Kumar - Full Document

Akila Vijayakumar vs The State Represented By

also taken and clubbed together and the Special Team regarding Forgery and Fraudulent Documents Provisions Wing had proceeded with the investigation. 7. The learned Government ... signature containing document and the disputed signature of late Bhuvarahan. It has given an opinion that the signature found on the document in question
Madras High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - S S Kumar - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next