deal with forgery. Section 465
directs punishment for forgery and Section 468 directs punishment
for forgery used for the purpose of cheating. They read ... with fine, or with both.
... ... ...
468. Forgery for purpose of cheating.--Whoever commits
forgery, intending that the 3 [document or electronic record forged]
shall
that this is also a forged document that is
placed before the civil Court not one but every document. This
is the second blush ... crime. The issue is
not even investigated into. The contention is forgery of
documents even before they reached the civil Court and the
forgery being
offence under Section 467 and 471 is forgery. The condition precedent for forgery is making a false document....... A person is said to have made ... false documents" as defined under section 464 . If what is executed is not a false document, there is no forgery. If there
kidnapping that is brought out in the complaint.
Allegation of forgery and fabrication of documents are also
contents in the complaint ... investigation.
7. Since the allegations levelled are that of kidnapping,
forgery, fabrication of documents and bigamy against the
petitioners, these are serious disputed questions
indulging into any kind of forgery or preparation of any document by committing forgery as such.
The nature of cause essentially is 'civil
petitioner stated that he gave a complaint about the forgery of
documents and creating mortgage and encumbrance over properties, using forged
documents. Though the case
annexed with the letter. When the Principal got to know about this forgery, he gave a show cause notice to Kripa Nidhan Tiwari ... under Section 468 IPC is the commission of forgery with an intention to use the forged document for the purposes of cheating, whereas the essential
case with regard to issuance of Ex.P16, author
of the document ie., Ex.P16 has to be examined ... helpful to the case of the prosecution case.
The documents do not disclose about the forgery of signatures
of the Principal NOVA Engineering College
same person. Therefore,
there is no question of forgery and falsification of documents by the
petitioner herein. In fact, now the entire investigation completed
complaint no doubt alleges financial fraud,
criminal conspiracy and forgery forging the documents for the
purpose of cheating against the petitioners. For this Court
