forged such
document. Section 470 defines a forged document as a false
document made by forgery.
9. The term "forgery" used in these ... offence under sections
467 and 471 is forgery. The condition precedent for forgery is
making a false document (or false electronic record or part
thereof
made any false
document or part of the document/record to
execute mortgage deed under the guise of that
‘false document’. Hence, neither respondent ... forged documents. It is the imposter who can be
said to have made the false document by
committing forgery. In such an event the trial
made any false
document or part of the document/record to
execute mortgage deed under the guise of that
‘false document’. Hence, neither respondent ... stretch be called as a false document. If it is not a false
document, then the offence of forgery is not made out. There
made any false
document or part of the document/record to
execute mortgage deed under the guise of that
‘false document’. Hence, neither respondent ... stretch be called as a false document. If it is not a false
document, then the offence of forgery is not made out. There
made any false
document or part of the document/record to
execute mortgage deed under the guise of that
‘false document’. Hence, neither respondent ... stretch be called as a false document. If it is not a false
document, then the offence of forgery is not made out. There
registered Document No.948/2013 on the file of
the Sub Registrar, Sowcarpet, Chennai. This document was declared to be a
forgery document ... judis
W.P.No.12480 of 2014
the forgery document No.730/1969 registered at the office of the Sub
Registrar, Purasawalkkam and also other
issue Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st
respondent to cancel the forgery documents registered by the 2nd
respondent on the basis of the petitioner representation ... petition is filed to direct the first respondent to
cancel the forgery documents registered by the second respondent,
on the basis of the petitioner representation
first respondent to
cancel the forgery Documents in Document No.3222/2020 dated
02.11.2020 and Document No.3733/2020 dated 30.11.2020 on base the
petitioner ... first
respondent to cancel the alleged forgery documents, namely, Document
No.3222/2020 dated 02.11.2020 and Document No.3733/2020 dated
30.11.2020, and pass final
Chief Justice then was) observed that the case involved
allegations of forgery of documents to embezzle the funds of the
bank. In such a situation ... committing a murder or getting
involved in a financial scam or forgery of documents, cannot
claim discharge or acquittal on the ground of her gender
interview, fake and ghost
interviews, tampering with the final records,
fabricating documents, forgery? Each of this would
attract the penal provisions of Indian Penal Code
