argued by learned Counsel for the petitioner is accepted, the forgeries of documents for which a party as such may not be interested ... would be a strained thinking that any offence involving forgery of document, if committed far outside the precincts of the Court and long before
punishment for forgery. Section 468 deals with forgery for purpose of cheating. Section 471 is against using as genuine a forged document or electronic record ... concerned, the same are in respect of act of forgery of the documents i.e., kist receipts in C77 series for the faslis
upon administration of justice. It is possible
that such forged document or forgery may cause a very serious or substantial
injury to a person ... provision would also operate where after commission of
an act of forgery the document is subsequently produced in Court, is capable
of great misuse
upon administration of justice. It is possible
that such forged document or forgery may cause a very serious or substantial
injury to a person ... provision would also operate where after commission of
an act of forgery the document is subsequently produced in Court, is capable
of great misuse
forged such
document. Section 470 defines a forged document as a false
document made by forgery.
9. The term "forgery" used in these ... offence under sections
467 and 471 is forgery. The condition precedent for forgery is
making a false document (or false electronic record or part
thereof
upon administration of justice. It is possible
that such forged document or forgery may cause a very serious or substantial
injury to a person ... provision would also operate where after commission of
an act of forgery the document is subsequently produced in Court, is capable
of great misuse
committed forgery
as defined under Section 463 .
(a) Section 463 of the IPC reads as under:
"463. Forgery. - Whoever makes any false
documents ... make a false document. Unless he
makes a false document, it cannot be alleged that
he has committed any forgery even if he has intent
made any false
document or part of the document/record to
execute mortgage deed under the guise of that
‘false document’. Hence, neither respondent ... forged documents. It is the imposter who can be
said to have made the false document by
committing forgery. In such an event the trial
made any false
document or part of the document/record to
execute mortgage deed under the guise of that
‘false document’. Hence, neither respondent ... stretch be called as a false document. If it is not a false
document, then the offence of forgery is not made out. There
made any false
document or part of the document/record to
execute mortgage deed under the guise of that
‘false document’. Hence, neither respondent ... stretch be called as a false document. If it is not a false
document, then the offence of forgery is not made out. There
