committed
forgery at the office of State Bank of India, Chandwara Main Road, District
Koderama, State Zharkhand and on the basis of forged documents, without ... committed forgery by misusing official seal of the bank
and without its intervention, somebody has collected goods on the basis of
forged documents without paying
Surveyor the claim fell under
Sec. C of the policy relating to Forgery or Alteration but they finally
opined that it was covered under ... would not have
occurred as the documents produced sufficiently show that it was a case of
fraud and forgery.
14. Counsel
Because there is forgery with regard to signature
of O.P.No.1. The Bill of Exchange is a spurious document so far as
acknowledgement
Because there is forgery with regard to signature
of O.P.No.1. The Bill of Exchange is a spurious document so far as
acknowledgement
person.
8. There is special clause for forgery in the
Bankers Indemnity Policy, which runs as under:-
FORGERY OR ALTERATION:
By reason of the payment ... document
whether received over the Counter or through the Clearing House or by Mail.
9. It is not disputed that in case of forgery
Udaya Kumari colluding
with her brother G. Gynaneshwar manipulated the documents and influenced the opposite
party the Sub-Registrar, Sanga Reddy and
played fraud ... photograph
of the vendor was affixed. It is an act
of forgery. The opposite party thus
issued two erroneous E.Cs consequently
his rights were
person. Moreover, the 1st respondent has been issuing all policies basing the
documents, proposal form and payment without personal presence of any proposer ... does not in any way show that there was admission
of impersonation, forgery, fraud etc.
The contention that was taken by
Ramesh Reddy
Chief State Examiner of Documents, C.I.D., M.S. Pune, which
is reproduced as under :-
OPINION
The documents of this case have been carefully ... were
forged. Person who has signed documents marked S-1 to S-20 did not put
signatures on documents marked
payment of Rs.2,241.20. We find that the introduction of
document at this stage and without proof and without sufficient
explanation for the delay ... also contended that Ext.P1 is the result for
forgery. According to him in the absence of the appointing authority
being made a party
taken away from the
complainant by someone else and later on by forgery, amount of Rs.
15,000/- was withdrawn from the complainant ... letter to
Bank's Manager with his admission that by making forgery by him,
cheque of Rs. 15,000/- was presented and said amount
