false creation of any false documents
and thereby, the accused had not committed any forgery and there
is no question of cheating involved in this ... disputed patta is missing / not
available. Tampering and creating of forgery documents, statutory
and governments, are offences of serious in nature. On the facts
beneficiaries are forged documents. Hence, the offence
of forgery using false documents and misappropriating the government funds
had occurred. In view of the same
antecedents, bulldozing
the officials, giving false complaint against them, creating false documents,
committing forgery. PW1 is an unbelievable person who has got criminal
antecedents, which ... Rights Commission, PW1 had paid fine amount.
Further, PW1 had prepared forged documents as though it has been issued
by the officials of the Transport
mentioned. In the civil suit, there is no mention about forgery of
documents by the petitioners. The civil suit ... thumb impression found in document
No.4078/1994 (Q1) (disputed document) and the document
No.4357/2012 (Q2) (admitted document) are identical with each other
forgery, the alleged offences has no legs to stand against the
petitioner.
5.The basic ingredient to substantiate forgery, there should be a false
document ... stated that the offence
of forgery can be committed only by making false documents, which is not
found in the above case.
6.The learned
look into
these aspects.
(vi)Further the trial Court held forgery and forged documents are
proved in this case. The only other allegation is with ... Court had not relied upon them and
gave a finding that no forgery is proved. PW36, the Investigating Officer
admitted that
Venkatasamy Reddiar by a sale deed dated 06.04.1960 registered as
Document No.1041/1960 in SRO, Madhuranthakam. The said Muthusamy
Mudaliar passed away ... other accused had conspired in
preparation of the forged documents and committed the offence of forgery
and cheating. Hence, the defacto complainant lodged a complaint
persons, such affidavit is required. In the
present case the forgery of the document is clearly proved, for the simple
reason, admittedly the first petitioner ... investigation. During the investigation it was found that the
forged document were filed as document in OS.No.560 of 2015 before
the Sub-Court
their creditworthiness,
along with relevant documents, including their self-audited balance sheets.
The authenticity of the rental agreements and documents relating to title ... regard. If the rental
agreement is a false document, that alone would not amount to forgery. Only
if the petitioner knowingly uses the false rental
petitioner is
that since the 2nd respondent has not sent the necessary documents to the
Forensic Department in time, for obtaining forensic report and that ... himself engaged a private
agency to study the documents, obtained the forensic report and
confirmed the forgery committed by the 1st respondent. Hence, he sought
