reads as under:
"468. Forgery for purpose of cheating, - Whoever
commits forgery, intending that the document or
electronic record forged shall be used ... said document as
genuine document. In the case on hand, the de-facto
complainant has to prove that the petitioner has created a
document
facto complainant the document
bearing No.2568 of 1980 dated 10.11.1980 is the document is
created by way of forgery by the petitioners. The forensic ... executed the document, then whole contention of the de-
facto complainant that the petitioners have created the
document by way of forgery cannot be accepted
stating that
Ex.D1 is not fabricated document, allegations that the petitioner
has filed fabricated document and that giving false evidence
basing ... cognizance
will also apply.
18. However, unless it is alleged that forgery of
document is done after filing of the document in the Court,
restriction
facto complainant No.1 found that a document is created
by way of forgery purported to be a sale deed allegedly
executed ... owner and that he got the
document executed by way of forgery.
On the other hand, learned counsel for the de-facto
complainants has submitted
expert that the
document, which the petitioner is relying upon as the
genuine document, is found to be a forged document.
Therefore, the de-facto ... realized about the
offences committed by the petitioner in respect of forgery of
document only when the report of the handwriting expert was
received
Secretary of the
A.P. Bar Council and also collected all the documents, including
the application filed by the petitioner/A2 for enrolment ... innocent and he is no way concerned with the
alleged forgery of the document and if at all anything is done, it
is only
attested all the documents. Police have collected information
11
that A3 has signed as many as 6 documents as witness
belonging to A5.
20. Therefore ... that the petitioners have
12
committed offence of forgery and using the said documents as
original and other connected offences, this Court cannot quash
strong prima-facie material in respect of allegations
that forgery was done and documents were created. Therefore,
it cannot be ruled that there
strong prima-facie material in respect of allegations
that forgery was done and documents were created. Therefore,
it cannot be ruled that there
over MRO (LW4) and created false and forged
documents in the forum of revision. Basing on the said revision
got the landed property. Therefore, there ... petitioner is the prime accused, who is
responsible for alleged forgery of the documents of MRO
proceedings. Therefore, when there are such serious allegations
against
