Form-10 while he was working as ROC which was found issued in violation of
ji
wnistray>
oi 'bey
WW
i
Contrary
Conduct)
Rules, 1964", if proved would still attract such gravest form of penalty as that of
dismissal, is to be considered.
(vi) We note ... effect that
4 during the period of his/her probation he/she wW neither apply for
any appointment elsewhere not sit for any examination
what is the | Group 'B' DPC consisting of:-
composition?
exists,
--
ww
1. Secretary(Edn) --- Chairman
2, Secretary (Law)-Member
3. Director of - Member ... applicant herein as wel as "he private responderts,
(whose application forms have been furnished by Ld. Counsel fer the
respondents Loon directions of tris
whieh inrplies that the application was ina
ardey,
2. The application form clearly reveals that the applicant had
mentioned his category ... dated 22.31.02 issued long before publication of the Natification,
eye ae .
iS ww A therefore, incall probabilities he would have utilized i while applying
accordance with law, conveying his decision in the form of reasoned and speakin ng
orders to the applicant herein.
In the event of a favourable ... costs,
(Dr. Nandita Chatterjee)
Administrative Member
sl
Cara ACE SQ], ww
this order.
The concerned respondent authority should convey his decision
in the form of a reasoned and speaking order to the applicant.
In case ... stands disposed of. No costs.
oo
(Bidisha Banerjee)
Member (J)
Ww
Satyajit Roy vs Eastern Railway on 21 May, 2018
CENTRAL ADMIMSTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
JUB
"RARV
Goutam Saren vs National Test House on 20 June, 2022
' 1 OA 352/2020
Arvind Mohan Sahay vs Central Excise & Customs on 22 January, 2020
I
'
,4
Devika Biswas vs Police on 25 March, 2022
OA. 351/356/2020
MA. 351/212