corporate companies and/or individual
medical practitioners, who may benefit from freebies/gifts, etc. in
violation of norms laid down by Indian Medical Council. Appellant ... pharma companies
for the educational programs and not for giving any freebies to the
delegates for the conferences and thus, it had not violated
corporate companies and/or individual
medical practitioners, who may benefit from freebies/gifts, etc. in
violation of norms laid down by Indian Medical Council. Appellant ... pharma companies
for the educational programs and not for giving any freebies to the
delegates for the conferences and thus, it had not violated
corporate companies and/or individual
medical practitioners, who may benefit from freebies/gifts, etc. in
violation of norms laid down by Indian Medical Council. Appellant ... pharma companies
for the educational programs and not for giving any freebies to the
delegates for the conferences and thus, it had not violated
corporate companies and/or individual
medical practitioners, who may benefit from freebies/gifts, etc. in
violation of norms laid down by Indian Medical Council. Appellant ... pharma companies
for the educational programs and not for giving any freebies to the
delegates for the conferences and thus, it had not violated
Factually, the funds received were used to provide freebies to the doctors
and medical practitioners. A satisfaction note by the Assessing Officer of
IFMER ... funds for Medical Education the funds
were used for providing freebies to doctors like travel, stay etc. It is clear that
the grant
Factually, the funds received were used to provide freebies to the doctors
and medical practitioners. A satisfaction note by the Assessing Officer of
IFMER ... funds for Medical Education the funds
were used for providing freebies to doctors like travel, stay etc. It is clear that
the grant
Factually, the funds received were used to provide freebies to the doctors
and medical practitioners. A satisfaction note by the Assessing Officer of
IFMER ... funds for Medical Education the funds
were used for providing freebies to doctors like travel, stay etc. It is clear that
the grant
Serum Institute Of India Ltd.,, Pune vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax,, on 12 October
discounts
is a post-facto step, which cannot be equated with freebies, which are
prohibited by the notification of Medical Council of India. Since discounts
disallow expenditure incurred by
pharmaceutical companies inter-alia in providing 'freebies' to doctors in
violation of the MCI Regulations. The term "freebies ... expenditure so incurred by assessee does not amount to provision of
'freebies' to medical practitioners. The expenditure incurred
