Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

G. Vidyasagar vs P. Venkataramana Reddy on 11 October, 2001 ORDER P.S. Narayana, J. 1. Heard both the counsel and perused the material available

G.Vidyasagar Reddy, vs Kjr Entrepreneurs India Pvt.Ltd., on 15 September, 2017 Cause Title/Judgement-Entry STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM Telangana   Complaint Case ... 2015   1. G.Vidyasagar Reddy, S/o.Ram Reddy Aged about 32 years, Occupation Software Employee R/o.Plot No.313,Street

Versus 1. Sh. Shardendu Vidyasagar S/o Sh. Ishwar Chand Vidyasagar 2. Smt. Aarti Devi Ahluwalia W/o Sh. Shardendu Vidyasagar Both ... with section 6 of the Hindu Minority Savita Agnihotri vs. Shardendu Vidyasagar G No.-09/12 Decided on : 29.08.2013 Page 1 /16 and Guardianship

Appellant/petitioner: Sri C. Ramachandra Raju Counsel for the respondents: Sri G. Vidyasagar, Learned Senior Counsel and Sri A. Ravi Babu <Gist: >Head ... common order dated 20.10.2017, noted the submission of Sri G. Vidyasagar, Learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the Corporation, that it would suffice, instead

Appellant/petitioner: Sri C. Ramachandra Raju ^ Counsel for the respondents: Sri G. Vidyasagar, Learned Senior Counsel and Sri A. Ravi Babu < Gist: > Head ... common order dated 20.10.2017, noted the submission of Sri G. Vidyasagar, Learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the Corporation, that it would suffice, instead

Srinivasa Madiraju, learned counsel for petitioners. ^Counsel for Respondents: 1. Sri G. Vidyasagar, learned Senior Counsel representing Ms. K. Udaya Sri, learned counsel for respondent ... impugned order dated 08.09.2022. Contention of the TRANSCO:- 17. Sri G. Vidyasagar, learned Senior Counsel representing Ms. K. Udaya Sri, learned counsel for respondent

Srinivasa Madiraju, learned counsel for petitioners. ^Counsel for Respondents: 1. Sri G. Vidyasagar, learned Senior Counsel representing Ms. K. Udaya Sri, learned counsel for respondent ... impugned order dated 08.09.2022. Contention of the TRANSCO:- 17. Sri G. Vidyasagar, learned Senior Counsel representing Ms. K. Udaya Sri, learned counsel for respondent

respondents sought transfer of shares they had allegedly bought from A.G. Vidyasagar & Co. Thus, there CO. APP 19 of 2023 & connected matters ... also most relevant to notice that as per the record, A.G. Vidyasagar and Co, had purportedly purchased the said shares only

respondents sought transfer of shares they had allegedly bought from A.G. Vidyasagar & Co. Thus, there CO. APP 19 of 2023 & connected matters ... also most relevant to notice that as per the record, A.G. Vidyasagar and Co, had purportedly purchased the said shares only

respondents sought transfer of shares they had allegedly bought from A.G. Vidyasagar & Co. Thus, there CO. APP 19 of 2023 & connected matters ... also most relevant to notice that as per the record, A.G. Vidyasagar and Co, had purportedly purchased the said shares only