grant of ryotwari
patta. His name was also recorded in Gillman register of the year 1904. In-
fact, prior to 1904 also, the land ... pattadar column no.8 in Gillman Register of 1904, which is a settlement
register. The said HFW Gillman, who is a special agent for Government
pattadar column No.8 in
Gillman Register of 1904, which is a settlement register. The said
HFW Gillman, who is a special agent for Government ... Pattadar column No.8, in Gillman Register 1904, which is
a Settlement Register. As the said HFW Gillman is a special agent
prepared
at that time, which is more popularly known as the Gillman
register, under the provisions of the Madras Survey and
Boundaries Act, 1897 would ... still pending.
6. The petitioners rely upon the entries in the Gillman
register, in relation to Sy.No.24 to claim that the said land
classification of the subject land was
erroneously mentioned/continued in the Settlement Register as Poramboke
and in the remarks column as Ralla Gutta instead ... Inam Fair Register under TD No.951 and Inam-B Register of
Vizianagaram Bit-II and also pre-abolition record of Gillman Register
Jirayati" in the Survey and Settlement Register ("Gilman Register") of the
year 1903, which is an authentic official record prepared under ... Khata Number is shown as "12" in the
Gillman Register, in relation to the land in Survey No.48/1B and the name
facts with a request to delete the
subject lands from the Assignment Register. A copy was also marked to
Respondent No.2 namely the District ... contended that the Respondents were merely stating that the MDR and
Gillman Register were tampered, whereas this contention gets belied from the
material produced
facts with a request to delete the
subject lands from the Assignment Register. A copy was also marked to
Respondent No.2 namely the District ... contended that the Respondents were merely stating that the MDR and
Gillman Register were tampered, whereas this contention gets belied from the
material produced
facts with a request to delete the
subject lands from the Assignment Register. A copy was also marked to
Respondent No.2 namely the District ... contended that the Respondents were merely stating that the MDR and
Gillman Register were tampered, whereas this contention gets belied from the
material produced
facts with a request to delete the
subject lands from the Assignment Register. A copy was also marked to
Respondent No.2 namely the District ... contended that the Respondents were merely stating that the MDR and
Gillman Register were tampered, whereas this contention gets belied from the
material produced
facts with a request to delete the
subject lands from the Assignment Register. A copy was also marked to
Respondent No.2 namely the District ... contended that the Respondents were merely stating that the MDR and
Gillman Register were tampered, whereas this contention gets belied from the
material produced
