been fixed as „Very
Good plus" meaning two outstanding and three very Good
grading in the last five APARs.
6 O.A No. 1462 ... APAR for 2010-11 to „Good‟ is that although
the Accepting Authority modified the grading from „Good‟ to
„Very Good‟ but none of the attributes
during the immediately for the preceding five
years, he had maintained good APAR grading and therefore, starting
from 2018-2019 for five years till ... which he claimed 2 nd MACP
he maintained 'very good' APAR rating and therefore, Annexure-A4 could
not have stood scrutiny. Thus Annexure
APAR for CMO promotion.
Unfortunately, for the years 2010-11 and 2011-12,
her APAR is below benchmark. Still she has 05 'Very
Good ... APAR 2010-11 (Good)
was upgraded from 'Average' to 'Good', while grading
in APAR 2011-12 was retained as "Average
very good" for three years and 4 ½ months as against
four "very good" out of five APARs. According to the respondents ... applicant despite up gradation of APAR from Good to
Very good and available of APAR for the period 2000-
2001 till date
respondents were
under the impression that the requirement of 'very good'
APARs applies to the case of the applicant. However ... applicant is rated
as 'very good' in 2 APARs and 'good' in 3 APARs. The
benchmark is only 'good
Very Good' grading for the last 5 years. The
suomotu downgrading of 'Very Good' in one APAR to 'Good ... Very Good' plus which means
2 'Outstanding' and 3 'Very Good' in the last 5 APARs. However as per
Railway
very good" level. Her APAR for 2005-06 (considered in
lieu of APAR for 2009-10) was "good" and thus below ... 00328/2017 - Bangalore Bench ) 5
(3) The "good" APAR of 2005-06 was not communicated to her
within a reasonable time (violation
process of consideration, he was awarded 58 marks for his good APAR for the period 1995-96 and 71.25 for the very good rating ... scale as under:-
Outstanding - 100 marks
Excellent - 90 marks
Very good - 75 marks
Good - 60 marks
Satisfactory - 50 marks
Fair - 35 marks
Poor - 20 marks
respondent vide lr dt
8.9.2016 to upgrade the APAR to „Very Good‟ based on his interactions with the
applicant which revealed that the latter ... declare
the APARs in question as non est, the respondents are directed to consider the
upgrading of the APARs to „Very Good‟ for the periods
grading of Shri Indu Kumar Bhushan ranges from
"Good" to "Very Good" and was quite weak compared to
other Officers. After ... questioned terming his
"Good" and "Very Good" APARs as average. He has also
(OA No.552/2018)
(21)
termed the incidents
