Menon v. State of Bombay, [1951] S.C.R.
228, Kay v. Goodwin, (1830) 6 Bing. 576, Surtees v. Ellison ... matter of
controversy. Tindak C.J. stated this in Kay v. Goodwin(1):
"I take the effect of repealing a statute
piece of evidence
consisted of an affidavit sworn by Florence S. Goodwin, who
is the President of Durex Products Inc. There, among* other
things ... been substantial as
stated in the affidavit of Florence S.
Goodwin."
It was contended by Mr. Pathak that originally only samples
of the contraceptives
Central Gas Consumers Co. v. Clarke, (1863) 143 E. R.
331, and Goodwin v. Phillips (1908) 7 C. L. R. 16,
distinguished ... Court then quoted certain observations of Issacs
J., in an Australian case Goodwin v. Phillips (1), which are
much to the same effect as those
S.P. Gupta vs Union Of India & Anr on 30 December, 1981
Bench: P
Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record ... vs Union Of India on 16 October, 2015
Author: Jagdish
Justice K.S.Puttaswamy(Retd) And Anr. vs Union Of India And Ors. on 24
Common Cause (A Regd. Society) vs Union Of India on 9 March, 2018
Equivalent citations
Vijay Kumar Sharma & Ors. Etc vs State Of Karnataka & Ors. Etc on 27
Justice K.S.Puttaswamy(Retd) vs Union Of India on 26 September, 2018
Equivalent citations
observed by Tindal, C. J., in the case of Kay v.
Goodwin, (1830) 6 Bing 576 : 130 ER 1403 : (ER p1405)
"The effect
