Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 568 (0.78 seconds)

Rajesh Kumar vs State Of Haryana And Another on 3 July, 2012

were reserved for physically handicapped (Ortho) (Male) and 193 posts for physically handicapped (Ortho) (Female). As there was no reservation provided for physically handicapped persons ... handicaps. Since blindness and low vision are two distinct categories of physically handicapped and the low vision category has never been exempted from reservation, advertisement
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 1 - A G Masih - Full Document

Rajesh Kumar vs Punjab Public Service Commission on 13 November, 2017

handicapped category i.e. for blind, deaf and orthopaedically handicapped candidates and read in the following terms:- "8. DEFINITION OF CATEGORIES j. PHYSICALLY HANDICAPPED ... Commission has faulted in taking the 3% reservation for physically handicapped persons as one composite unit and thereby in not having made recommendations separately towards
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - T S Dhindsa - Full Document

Darshan Singh Bhullar vs Punjab State Power Corp Ltd & Anr on 30 September, 2016

handicapped employee in the cadre of Superintending Engineers. As per notification dated 23.9.2011 (Annexure P-5), the physically handicapped employees were given 3% reservation ... category candidate before coming into force of the policy of allowing reservation to handicapped persons issued vide letter dated 23.9.2011. It was adopted by respondent
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - D Chaudhary - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next