Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 242 (0.69 seconds)

Adarsh Kumar S/O Shri Atal Krishan ... vs State Of Haryana & Others on 20 July, 2012

physically handicapped and point No.1 is reserved for physically handicapped. OM dated 18.2.1997 issued by the Ministry of Personnel provides reservation as per roster ... instructions in that regard were in existence, the Railway Board denied reservation to handicapped persons. There was no issue with regard to reservation in promotion
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Deependra Kumar Sharma Ors vs State (Personnel Department)Ors on 30 April, 2012

illegal and arbitrary. The reservation to Scheduled Caste category ought to have been provided in the aforesaid physically handicapped category. Mr.G.S.Bapna, Senior ... Physically handicapped reservation is horizontal reservation; vertical reservation cannot be claimed by such categories as posts have been reserved for physically handicapped persons. Petitioners
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 17 - Cited by 3 - A Mishra - Full Document

Pankaj Kumar Srivastava vs Union Public Service Commission ... on 30 May, 2012

which he/she belongs. Reservation for SC/ST/OBC may be called vertical reservation and the reservation for physically handicapped persons as horizontal reservation ... also been provided that reservation for SC/ST/OBCs may be called vertical reservation and the reservation for physically handicapped persons as horizontal reservation; horizontal
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 14 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Rajesh Kumar vs State Of Haryana And Another on 3 July, 2012

were reserved for physically handicapped (Ortho) (Male) and 193 posts for physically handicapped (Ortho) (Female). As there was no reservation provided for physically handicapped persons ... handicaps. Since blindness and low vision are two distinct categories of physically handicapped and the low vision category has never been exempted from reservation, advertisement
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 1 - A G Masih - Full Document

All India Confederation Of The Blind vs Union Of India (Ministry Of Railways) on 7 March, 2012

advertisement as it did not provide any reservation for Physically Handicapped persons („PH persons‟ for brevity) though the Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights ... Government/Railways for the grant of benefit of reservation to the handicapped candidates and the actual recruitment of handicapped candidates against the quota meant
Delhi High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 1 - A K Sikri - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next