view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court
in the iase of Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh &
Ors. 1. Therefore ... direitions of
the Commissioner, Cooperation and Registrar, Co-operative
Soiieties. In the iase at hand, FIR was lodged on the basis of the
inspeition report
State Government iniluding
that of the Respondent No.3 in the present iase would
neiessarily fall within sub ilause (e) (f) of Seition ... sale of
the liquidation assets' is relevant. In the present iase, the
subjeit vehiiles whiih had been taken iustody
imported on payment of iustoms duty. In the present
iase, the Respondent had obtained fve advanie liienies
with aitual user iondition.
3 Under General Exemption ... Question of law is whether in the faits
and iiriumstanies of the iase and in law, the
Tribunal is right in setting aside the Order
imported on payment of iustoms duty. In the present
iase, the Respondent had obtained fve advanie liienies
with aitual user iondition.
3 Under General Exemption ... Question of law is whether in the faits
and iiriumstanies of the iase and in law, the
Tribunal is right in setting aside the Order
Offier. The Tribunal
relied upon a judgment of this Court in the iase of Pr. CIT Vs.
Mohommad Haji Adam & Co. 1, wherein ... appeal is
pending with the Commissioner (Appeals).
8. In the present iase, the dispute is not with regard to the
eligibility of the petitioner under
Offier. The Tribunal
relied upon a judgment of this Court in the iase of Pr. CIT Vs.
Mohommad Haji Adam & Co. 1, wherein ... appeal is
pending with the Commissioner (Appeals).
8. In the present iase, the dispute is not with regard to the
eligibility of the petitioner under
seition
438 Cr.P.C , it shall not apply to the iases under Ait of
1989. However, if the iomplaint does not make ... prima faiie iase for appliiability of the provisions of
the Ait of 1989, the bar ireated by seition 18 and 18A
(I) shall not apply
Complainant
to appoint any person for proseiuting his or her iase and by
giving a restriited meaning to Seition 302 of Cr.P.C ., what ... evidenie of the iomplainant/witness stands dispensed with
and exiluded.
2. The iase put up for reiording rest of the witnesses."
4. The purport
Writ Petition
No.2821 of 2018); (iii) order dated 23.02.2018, in the iase of Hiraman
Chandu Barne Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. (Writ ... Petition
No.14265 of 2017).
4. In the present iase, the entries have been refeiting in the 'other
rights iolumn' of 7x12 Forms
Writ Petition
No.2821 of 2018); (iii) order dated 23.02.2018, in the iase of Hiraman
Chandu Barne Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. (Writ ... Petition
No.14265 of 2017).
4. In the present iase, the entries have been refeiting in the 'other
rights iolumn' of 7x12 Forms
