recorded in the impugned Order,
contending that the rejection of the compounding application is
solely premised on procedural inadmissibility under Rule 4 ibid.
This inadmissibility ... that the impugned order is merely an interim order
highlighting deficiencies, rather than a definitive rejection of
application. Per contra learned Senior Counsel pointed
recorded in the impugned Order,
contending that the rejection of the compounding application is
solely premised on procedural inadmissibility under Rule 4 ibid.
This inadmissibility ... that the impugned order is merely an interim order
highlighting deficiencies, rather than a definitive rejection of
application. Per contra learned Senior Counsel pointed
recorded in the impugned Order,
contending that the rejection of the compounding application is
solely premised on procedural inadmissibility under Rule 4 ibid.
This inadmissibility ... that the impugned order is merely an interim order
highlighting deficiencies, rather than a definitive rejection of
application. Per contra learned Senior Counsel pointed
recorded in the impugned Order,
contending that the rejection of the compounding application is
solely premised on procedural inadmissibility under Rule 4 ibid.
This inadmissibility ... that the impugned order is merely an interim order
highlighting deficiencies, rather than a definitive rejection of
application. Per contra learned Senior Counsel pointed
M/S Gold Ripe International Pvt Ltd vs C.C. Noida on 12 December, 2025
Secon Logistics Pvt Ltd vs C. Ludhiana on 17 December, 2025
CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE
